Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to create an annotated bibliography. Here's my .tex document:

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\title{Annotated Bibliography}

\begin{document}

\nocite{*}

\bibliography{annotatedbib}

\end{document}

And here is the associated .bib document:

@Misc{hacker,
    AUTHOR = `{Andrew Hacker'},
    TITLE = {Is Algebra Necessary?},
    HOWPUBLISHED = {New York Times},
    MONTH = {July 31},
    YEAR = {2012},
    ANNOTE = {This article was published in the New York Times.},
}

No matter into which format I compile my .tex document, the annotation will not show up! Is there something that I'm missing?

share|improve this question
1  
Welcome to TeX.sx! There is no field ANNOTE. There is a field note. Here you can see which fields are defined: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/36248/… –  Marco Daniel Mar 2 '13 at 18:50

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

You should use a bibliography style that does annotations; for instance annotate.bst:

\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib}
@Misc{hacker,
    AUTHOR = {Andrew Hacker},
    TITLE = {Is Algebra Necessary?},
    HOWPUBLISHED = {New York Times},
    MONTH = {July 31},
    YEAR = {2012},
    ANNOTATE = {This article was published in the New York Times.},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\title{Annotated Bibliography}

\begin{document}

\nocite{*}

\bibliographystyle{annotate}
\bibliography{\jobname}

\end{document}

Note that the field should be called annotate, not annote; here's the output. The filecontents* environment is just to keep the example selfcontained, you can continue to use an external file.

enter image description here

Another style that does annotations (with the annote field) is chicago-annote that requires \usepackage[authoryear]{natbib}.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm very new to Latex--if you couldn't tell--so thanks! –  Brandon Mar 2 '13 at 19:24
    
Is there something like this similar to the plain bibliography style? –  vonbrand Mar 2 '13 at 22:30
    
I don't know. I ran a search for files having annot and .bst, finding those two. Probably biblatex is better at it. –  egreg Mar 2 '13 at 22:32
    
Here is a link to a page that describes the use of the plain-anote.bst file: math.ucdenver.edu/~billups/courses/ma5779/… Here is the link to plain-annote.bst: math.ucdenver.edu/~billups/courses/ma5779/plain-annote.bst –  Raea Hicks Oct 28 '13 at 23:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.