TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am using the polar library with pgfplots to plot a graph like this:

\addplot[mark = none, domain = 0.4:12, samples = 600, data cs = polarrad]{sin(x)};

As described in the manual, this uses radians for the function, but the axis labels are still plotted in degrees. Instead of having the 0, 30, …, 330 tick labels, I would like 0π, π/6, … 11π/6 labels. I am convinced the solution must be quite simple, but I have not been able to find it yet.

share|improve this question
Would xticklabel={$\pgfmathparse{\tick/180}\pgfmathprintnumber[frac,frac denom=6,frac whole=false]{\pgfmathresult}\pi$} option be sufficient for your needs? – percusse Mar 3 '13 at 13:23
@percusse setting xticklabel has no effect when I try it? (redefining \pgfplots@show@ticklabel@@polar has some effect but I guess that isn't the official interface? – David Carlisle Mar 3 '13 at 13:49
This is a solution that I could live with, thank you very much! (@DavidCarlisle it works for me.) Of course it would be nicer to have simplified fractions, but if this is the simplest solution, then I guess there is no built-in way to label axes using radians. – Ruud Mar 3 '13 at 13:50
@DavidCarlisle You have to include \usepgfplotslibrary{polar}, let me cook up a MWE. – percusse Mar 3 '13 at 13:51
@percusse yes I got that far and can run the MWE and get a plot. I guess I should just leave pgf questions to egreg... – David Carlisle Mar 3 '13 at 13:58
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I've simplified the fractions a little more


\pgfmathifisint{\pgfmathresult}{$\pgfmathprintnumber[int detect]{\pgfmathresult}\pi$}%
{$\pgfmathprintnumber[frac,frac denom=6,frac whole=false]{\pgfmathresult}\pi$}
\addplot[mark = none, domain = 0.4:12, samples = 600, data cs = polarrad]{sin(x)};


enter image description here

You can introduce yet another \ifnum inside the integer check to remove 1 from 1pi but seems like an overkill to me. It's pretty readable in my humble opinion.

share|improve this answer
oh flip I nearly answered this an hour ago and could have had lots of lovely tikz points but I added xticklabel to the wrong place (\addplot) +1 to you +0 to me:( – David Carlisle Mar 3 '13 at 14:11
@DavidCarlisle Go ahaed and post it please I'm not super happy with the way it is anyways. :) – percusse Mar 3 '13 at 14:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.