Which Times-like package provides better typesetting for text and math? [closed]

I am using `libertine` and `newtxmath` packages in my document for typesetting by `pdflatex`. The following code shows the fonts setup.

``````\usepackage[protrusion=true,expansion=true]{microtype}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
%
\usepackage[oldstyle,semibold,type1]{libertine}% Linux Libertine font
\usepackage{textcomp}% Required to get special symbols
\usepackage[scaled=.85]{beramono}% Typewriter font
\usepackage{mathtools,amssymb,amsthm} % AMS packages
\usepackage[libertine,cmintegrals,cmbraces,vvarbb]{newtxmath}
\usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}% Extra math symbols
\usepackage{bm}% Extra bold faces
% Define semibold shape for typewriter family
{\ttfamily}
\DeclareFontShape{\encodingdefault}{\ttdefault}{sb}{n}{<->ssub*\ttdefault/b/n}{}
\usepackage{soul} % For increased spacing of capitals and small caps
``````

However, there are several other Times-like packages in wide sense, most notably Tex Gyre Termes and the recently released STIX package for latex. Which times-like package does a better job for typesetting text and math in latex, i.e. better typography, more symbols, matching math script fonts? I am specially interesetd in modern vesrions like Time New Roman and even lighter derivatives like Linux Libertine with more complete set of weights and shapes. A similar question was asked Here. Should I keep using `newtx` or switch to a newer package like `STIX`?

P.S. `boondoxo` font package provides both lowercase and uppercase calligraphic math symbols as well as their bold versions.

-

closed as primarily opinion-based by Speravir, Joseph Wright♦Feb 26 '14 at 19:11

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

If you load the `libertine` package and the `newtxmath` package with the `libertine` option, you won't get a `Times`-like text and math fonts but, well, `Linux Libertine`-like fonts. For a non-comprehensive review of the looks of various font families -- including several `Times`-like fonts -- that have both text and math font groups, you may want to check out tex.stackexchange.com/a/59706/5001. – Mico Mar 11 '13 at 17:55
If you are interested in achieving better line-breaking and interword spacing, I would recommend that you check out the `microtype` package. It allows you to customize various aspects of your fonts. – void-pointer Mar 12 '13 at 11:21
@Mico, thanks. For some people Linux Libertine is Times! because I changed `ptm` to `libertine` in university thesis style, and they did not complain. I personally prefer libertine because it is slightly lighter and still formal. For matchning math symbols, `newtx` does a good job. It uses the same math symbols for other times-like fonts. My question is, is it possible to get better typesetting from other times-like font packages? Are open-type math fonts such as STIX have better metrics? ... – Aydin Mar 12 '13 at 11:52
@void-pointer thanx. I use `microtype`. And I have `T1` encoding. – Aydin Mar 12 '13 at 11:56
Note that, matchning math symbols, different weights and shapes including small caps, and detailed metrics for TeX are of interest here, since there are many well designed fonts out there. – Aydin Feb 26 '14 at 9:07