Tell me more ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Currently I'm having to write something like:

enter image description here

I'm writing "q" in the denominator as |\vec{q}| using the "pipe"; is it the proper way to do it?

share|improve this question
You should accept an answer if you find it satisfactory. – Svend Tveskæg Mar 20 at 8:18

2 Answers

One way to do it is the following.

Code

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{mathtools}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\abs}{\lvert}{\rvert}

\begin{document}
\[
\frac{\vec{q} \cdot \vec{r}_j}{\abs{\vec{q}\,} \times \abs{\vec{r}_j}}
\]
\end{document}

Output

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
3  
A \vec without subscripts immediately followed by a bar clashes with it, so probably \abs{\vec{q}\,} is better. – egreg Mar 13 at 11:27
Good point; I'll edit my answer. – Svend Tveskæg Mar 13 at 11:28

As far as I'm into LaTeX this is correct. I would put your formular as

$=\frac{\vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}_j}{|\vec{q}|\times|\vec{r}_j|}$

So for getting the absolute value typing the pipe | is fine. But do not use the pipe for some expression like

{a \in A | a \notin B}

instead use \mid there.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.