Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Currently I'm having to write something like:

enter image description here

I'm writing "q" in the denominator as |\vec{q}| using the "pipe"; is it the proper way to do it?

share|improve this question
Since you have some responses below that seem to answer your question, please consider marking one of them as ‘Accepted’ by clicking on the tickmark below their vote count (see How do you accept an answer?). This shows which answer helped you most, and it assigns reputation points to the author of the answer (and to you!). It's part of this site's idea to identify good questions and answers through upvotes and acceptance of answers. –  Jubobs Jun 29 '14 at 16:48

2 Answers 2

up vote 12 down vote accepted

One way to do it is the following.




\frac{\vec{q} \cdot \vec{r}_j}{\abs{\vec{q}\,} \times \abs{\vec{r}_j}}


enter image description here

share|improve this answer
A \vec without subscripts immediately followed by a bar clashes with it, so probably \abs{\vec{q}\,} is better. –  egreg Mar 13 '13 at 11:27

As far as I'm into LaTeX this is correct. I would put your formular as


So for getting the absolute value typing the pipe | is fine. But do not use the pipe for some expression like

{a \in A | a \notin B}

instead use \mid there.

share|improve this answer
You'll get wrong spacing by using |s instead of \lvert and \rvert. –  Svend Tveskæg Dec 16 '13 at 4:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.