TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In a previous question I got recommended to use \EveryPar instead of \everypar.

What is the difference between the two?

Are there other commands that I should capitalize the same way in ConTeXt?

share|improve this question
I don't know much about ConTeXt, but I guess that \EveryPar provides some interface for using the primitive \everypar that's not so easy to deal with. – egreg Mar 25 '13 at 23:13
up vote 10 down vote accepted

From syst-aux.mkiv:

It's common use to use \everypar for special purposes. In ConTeXt we use this primitive for locating sidefloats. This means that when user assignments to \everypar can interfere with those of the package. We therefore introduce \EveryPar.

The same goes for \type \EveryLine. Because TeX offers no \everyline primitive, we have to call for \everyline when we are working on a line by line basis. Just by calling \EveryPar{} and \EveryLine{} we restore the old situation.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.