TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've a simple question I can't figure out. There should be an option that can force the symbols up and down of a formula put inside text. e.g. If I write

blablabla $\bigcup_{stuff}$ blablabla

the part "stuff" is put on the right side of the symbol instead of down. I would like to force "stuff" to be put under the simbol \bigcup. What do I have to do?

share|improve this question
Welcome to TeX.SX! – Foo Bar Apr 11 '13 at 13:38
There's a reason why in inline math limits are not set under the operator (\bigcup, \sum or similar): the line becomes too high (or deep) and the page is spoiled. – egreg Apr 11 '13 at 20:07

Use \limits:


The above ^ and below _ parts may be empty, of course. This works also for \prod and \sum, for example (for all math operators to be exact).

But as mentioned already in the comments: It's not always good to force some output, because the line height could get to big. You have to try with your document because we don't know your settings (font, font size, line height, etc).

share|improve this answer
Alternatively: $\displaystyle \bigcup_{stuff}$. – Jubobs Apr 11 '13 at 13:55
@Jubobs -- using \displaystyle, the \bigcup will be the full display size. the text baselines will be quite uneven just using \limits; \displaystyle will only make the situation worse. – barbara beeton Apr 11 '13 at 14:25
@barbarabeeton You're right. Apologies. – Jubobs Apr 11 '13 at 14:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.