Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I just ran the MiKTeX Updater and there was an update for Inconsolata. I also refreshed the FNDB and it is listed as installed in the Package Manager, but when I try to compile my documents that have \usepackage{inconsolata} I only get the error that File 'inconsolata.sty' not found.

How to fix this?

share|improve this question
2  
There is no inconsolata.sty on CTAN. The sty in the package is called zi4. –  Ulrike Fischer Jun 19 '13 at 8:28
    
@UlrikeFischer Interesting. So, this is a MiKTeX database error using a wrong file name? edit: Yeah, If I change \usepackage{inconsolata} (that always worked and is also on the Font Catalogue) to \usepackage{zi4}, it works again... –  Foo Bar Jun 19 '13 at 8:30
1  
No, miktex simply took what is on CTAN. The package has renamed its sty (I don't know why). –  Ulrike Fischer Jun 19 '13 at 8:34
    
OK, thanks. As written in the edit to my last comment: \usepackage{zi4} makes it work again. –  Foo Bar Jun 19 '13 at 8:35
3  
It seems that inconsolata (by Karl Berry) has been superseded by the new package (by Michael Sharpe). I'd say that a name change for the package (or an alias) would be welcome. –  egreg Jun 24 '13 at 16:07
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I had a chat with the maintainer, and although it was not originally meant to replace the original package, another maintainer asked for the original package to be moved to obsolete.

What is also missing from the new package is the otf font. here is what the maintainer said:

I didn't include otf versions with the package because I intended this to be a LaTeX support package. In rechecking the package details and finding that the documentation did not recompile as I expected, I found that I had omitted 3 files from the original package---the tfm's and the fd for ts1 encoding, which contains the straight quotes. I'll resend the corrected version to CTAN ASAP. All glyphs print correctly when using both latex+dvips+ps2pdf and pdflatex workflows.

[...]

It was not written as a replacement, but became so after Karl Berry suggested that he move his package to obsolete, where it is still available and may be installed for your own use custom use.

I'm not willing to include the otf fonts in my package because I don't want to have to support them for use in LuaTeX and XeTeX. I suspect they will require considerable massaging to be able to used except in a very basic manner because, like the inconsolata ttf fonts from which they were derived, they do not use unicode names exclusively, and they contain no lookup tables.

I had an update from Karl Berry on the tex-live mailing list:

the replacement of inconsolata was intentional. In fact, it was my suggestion (I had created the original package), since Michael's new version seemed better in every way. (He had indeed originally uploaded it to CTAN as inconsolata-zi4.)

I failed to realize that Michael's package omitted the otf's. Michael, would you mind including them? I recognize the idea of "LaTeX support", but still, seems much simpler to just include the otf's than to have a whole separate package for them? That way everything is just there ...

As for the .sty file name, I did see that the new package didn't have inconsolata.sty, but I knew perfect compatibility was not going to be plausible, so changing documents to use the new .sty name seemed the best approach. I wouldn't go that route in all cases, but this one is not a core part of the system or anything. If you need perfect compatibility, probably just keeping the old inconsolata around is the only viable way ...

share|improve this answer
4  
I actually think this should have been handled in a much better way that would not break things. And dropping support for things like LuaLaTeX/XeLaTeX is major regression. I'm not sure why support had to be dropped instead of simply keeping the old functionality working. The maintainer gave me a link to an otf version of zi4 but this doesn't stop the fact that functionality has been broken. –  ArTourter Jul 2 '13 at 18:02
    
So, \IfFileExists{zi4.sty}{\usepackage{zi4}}{\usepackage{inconsolata}} is the (only) solution for now to create portable source files that use Inconsolata? –  krlmlr Jan 2 at 10:30
    
@krlmlr you should not have to resort to this when loading the package as an up to date version will offer both zi4.sty and inconsolata.sty. This was done back mid 2013 after a few complaints I think. As I reported in my answer, the package maintainer says that the old and new package have incompatibilities but I do not have a list of them. there are definitely new options in the new package but I don't know if options from the old one have different meaning in the new one. –  ArTourter Jan 6 at 12:04
add comment

inconsolata was renamed without announcment to zi4 for unknown(?) reasons, so changing all \usepackage{inconsolata} to \usepackage{zi4} solves the problem.

(Thanks to Ulrike Fischer in the comments for finding this out)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.