TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have almost no knowledge about licences and there differences. I use the standard LaTeX licence (lppl) for my sty files. Now I wonder if this licence is also suitable for a template. Previously I had not put any licence to my template and that resulting in two annoying things:

  1. it was changed and put online under a different name. This happened to a very early version and I found this code in a forum, where I could only give the advise to use my updated version instead.
  2. I got asked several times if I allow people to publish the pdf when my template was used. (Sure)

If lppl would have too many restrictions, would lgpl be suitable? If so, how would I put the project under that licence. I can not put every file under a licence. I could add a single file called licence.txt. But what would that contain? The text from gnu.org?

Note that I had asked this more or less before how-to-put-a-latex-project-template-under-a-license, but with no useful answer.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by egreg, Joseph Wright Dec 7 '13 at 21:33

  • This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The LPPL doesn't pose any restriction about using the “Work” for producing a document. A document using a class/package/template released under the LPPL is not a “Derived Work”. – egreg Jun 20 '13 at 21:19
See The GPL and LaTeX packages – Martin Schröder Jun 22 '13 at 23:25
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about a legal problem, rather than TeX related – egreg Dec 7 '13 at 21:33

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.