TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Which constructs in (La)TeX and (La)TeX packages have classification \mathinner?

The TeXbook mentions:

  • fractions
  • \left...\right constructions
  • \ldots, \cdots, \ddots

Which fractions - all? Do other frequently used packages (e.g. AMS-LaTeX) define other constructs (e.g. I'm assuming all types of triple dots in AMS-LaTeX)?

One might expect the following to generate \mathinner, but they don't:

  • \bigl...\bigr (and the larger-size analogues)
  • \lvert...\rvert
share|improve this question
There's no reason why \bigl...\bigr should be inner, nor \lvert...\rvert. – egreg Jan 29 '14 at 7:45
@egreg 1. You can think of them as an instantiation of \left...\right, which in effect reduces to one of the \σl...\σr-sizes. 2. A user might not know that \σl and \σr don't need to be paired. – Lover of Structure Jan 29 '14 at 7:58

amsmath defines \@cdots as \mathinner; this in turn is used for \cdots, \dotsi, \dotsb, \dotsmand \intdots.

\mathellipsis and \ddots are so defined in fontmath.ltx.

mathtools doesn't add anything obvious.

i don't claim this list is complete.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.