TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am currently generating my bibliography as follows:


This generates full citations in footnotes, with optional pre- and post-notes.

Depressingly, it looks like I'll have to regress to bibTeX for a journal thing, so to make things run smoothly, I'd like to put my house in order before sending off the manuscript.

So what are my options? What \bibliographystyle should I use so that I get full citations with the \cite command? Is there a way to get references as footnotes with bibtex?

Or do I have to sed-fu my way to changing my \cites into \footnote\cites with the pre/post notes shifted as needed?

share|improve this question
I have not added the biblatex tag, because this doesn't seem to be a biblatex question, really. – Seamus Mar 24 '11 at 12:01
As biblatex is able to use BibTex as backend, what do you mean by "regress to bibTeX"? Is using biblatex not admissible, but other bibliography packages (e.g., jurabib) are? – lockstep Mar 25 '11 at 10:36
@lockstep I don't actually know what packages I can use (I'm trying to find out) but I do know that biblatex isn't allowed. – Seamus Mar 25 '11 at 12:10
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The way I see it, the tricky part is not \letting \cite to \footcite, but emulating the full citation and ibidem mechanisms of verbose-trad1. The jurabib package, which is not maintained anymore, seems to have served as a model for numerous biblatex features. Here's an example using jurabib that comes at least close to verbose-trad1 (a lot of minor formatting is still missing).






  author = {Blinder, Alan S.},
  year = {1974},
  title = {The economics of brushing teeth},
  journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
  volume = {82},
  number = {4},
  pages = {887--891},


Some text.\cite{Bli74}

Some text.\cite[p.~887]{Bli74}


share|improve this answer
Thanks, I'll see if this gets through. I'd forgotten about the ibidem features, so that's not important: it was part of the style demanded, but I hate it. So if it doesn't do that it's not important: if the editors want that style, they can do it themselves! – Seamus Mar 25 '11 at 13:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.