Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am a newbie with LaTeX when it comes to fonts. I would like to replace the double story "a" in Latin Modern for a single story "a" version (and similarly for the "g"). I just prefer my typeset output to look more in line with my handwritten output, aesthetics be damned. Last year, when I asked this question most people thought I was crazy to mess with the font design, but I want to do it anyway (I am stubborn that way).

To partly alleviate the mixing and matching ugliness of the output (I am not totally deaf to the wise comments of my detractors from yesteryear), I wish to use as a substitute Latin Modern italics, upright version, but only for the characters "a" and "g" (in all available font sizes and weights). I would hope that the clash would be thus minimized, as both fonts are Latin Modern, and so share some familiarity with each other.

First: how do I get access to this hidden font version of Latin Modern? Second: how do I make the change using LaTeX for these two glyphs only? A partial answer was suggested to me last year, using XeTeX (and I need to study it further in order to understand it), but I gather XeTeX is not completely compatible with microtype, and I would rather not learn a new paradigm for my typesetting if I can help it.

Thank you all for your answers. This forum is always very helpful to me.

share|improve this question
3  
What do you mean by "italic, upright"? I doubt very much that such a font exists, lm-info.pdf certainly doesn't show it. Beside this: Exchanging glyphs can be done either by editing the pdf and then recreating all the tfm etc, or with virtual fonts. Both would take me more than a day and I'm not a newbie regarding fonts. So how much time or money are you willing to invest? –  Ulrike Fischer Jan 4 at 18:41
    
The package cfr-lm offers access to the upright italic. (Latin Modern does include such a font.) However, replacing glyphs in the regular font with glyphs from this one is a really bad idea. Setting aside issues of font design in terms of the consistent look of different glyphs in a single font, you will lose all kerning involving a and g unless you manually specify kerning to compensate in your font configuration. And as @UlrikeFischer says, setting this up would be a big job even if you already know how to do it. (cfr-lm took a long time, even running tex overnight.) –  cfr Jan 4 at 19:58
1  
Have you considered using something like Gentium which does offer such alternate glyphs? –  cfr Jan 4 at 20:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.