I'm currently looking for a nice and challenging open-source project to work/collaborate on after my thesis. I don't have a Comp. Sci. background, but I'd like to learn more about compiler construction and I also would like to improve my TeX skills, so I figured: Two birds, one stone.
I was thinking of a LaTeX package that would allow for more advanced syntax highlighting of listings than is currently offered by the
listings package. I use the latter a lot and find it mostly pretty good, but I find it also very frustrating for some more advance stuff. Implementing proper syntax highlighting of a language with context-sensitive grammar---I hope I'm using the right term---is really a pain in the neck, in
listings. Also, Unicode isn't supported "out of the box".
Sure, we've got
pythontex. Those packages successfully unleashed the power of Python and
pygments in the world of TeX; however, customisation of the syntax highlighting (colour, etc.) involves writing/customising a
pygments lexer; in other words, it requires some Python coding outside the
.tex file. Wouldn't it be nice if everything could be done without using
-shell-escape? Or is there no point in trying to replicate
pygments in TeX?
Arguably, more powerful syntax highlighting seems more within reach, with a combination of
fancyvrb and powerful LaTeX3 packages such as
- Am I just fooling myself? Is there even a point in such a project? Or should we be content to use existing tools (
- Without turning this into a biglist, what, if anything, do you find frustrating about
listings? What would be on your wishlist for a hypothetical new package meant for typesetting source code?
- Would anybody interested in collaborating on such a project please stand up? Anybody? Hello...?
- What limitations of
l3regexshould I know about before deciding to use it for such a package?
Please do chime in below...