Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am using the following equation with boundary conditions,

enter image description here

I would like to position the equation centrally aligned and would like to keep the boundary condition to the right. But the equation is a little bit centre-left aligned and boundary conditions are not exactly at right. Would anyone suggest a better alignment for this case? Here is the snippet, if anyone likes to help!

\subsubsection{Outflow}
For the outflow boundary condition, the pressure is specified as a Dirichlet boundary condition, assigned with free-stream pressure and the density $\rho$ and the velocity $\vec{u}$ are specified as a Neumann boundary condition,
\begin{align}
p &= p_\infty & \text{ on }  \Gamma_{out} \\
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial \hat{n}} &= 0  & \text{ on }  \Gamma_{out} \\ 
\frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial \hat{n}} &= 0  & \text{ on }  \Gamma_{out}
\end{align}
share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

I would't use center alignment for the three equations: either you align them at the equals sign or left align them because of the side conditions. I wouldn't put the conditions too far from the equations, either: the conditions are part of the equations, after all. A \quad or \qquad seems sufficient.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}

\begin{document}

\section{Outflow}
For the outflow boundary condition, the pressure is specified as a Dirichlet boundary 
condition, assigned with free-stream pressure and the density $\rho$ and the velocity 
$\vec{u}$ are specified as a Neumann boundary condition,
\begin{alignat}{2}
&p = p_\infty\qquad                            && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$} \\
&\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial\hat{n}} = 0      && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$} \\
&\frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial \hat{n}} = 0 && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$}
\end{alignat}

\end{document}

enter image description here

If you want alignment on the equals signs, just change the position of the first &:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}

\begin{document}

\section{Outflow}
For the outflow boundary condition, the pressure is specified as a Dirichlet boundary
condition, assigned with free-stream pressure and the density $\rho$ and the velocity
$\vec{u}$ are specified as a Neumann boundary condition,
\begin{alignat}{2}
p &= p_\infty\qquad                            && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$} \\
\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial\hat{n}} &= 0      && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$} \\
\frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial \hat{n}} &= 0 && \text{on $\Gamma_{\mathrm{out}}$}
\end{alignat}

\end{document}

enter image description here

My personal preference goes to the first solution.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the \mathrm add on the subscripts. Would use them for all subscripts –  Sathish Krishnan Feb 15 at 18:01

To achieve your stated objective of placing the main equations in the middle of the textbock, you could augment your current system of equations with an additional, invisible column to the left of the main equations, and have new new column contain \text{on $\Gamma_{out}$ as well. The text can be made invisible by encasing it in a \phantom statement.

Note that it's not necessary to provide the invisible stuff in all three rows -- providing it once, e.g., in the first row, suffices to achieve the desired effect.

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand\Gout{\Gamma_{\!\textit{out}}} % occurs repeatedly
\begin{document}
\subsubsection{Outflow}
For the outflow boundary condition, the pressure is specified as a Dirichlet boundary 
condition, assigned with free-stream pressure and the density $\rho$ and the velocity 
$\vec{u}$ are specified as a Neumann boundary condition,
\begin{align}
&\phantom{\text{on $\Gout$}} & p &= p_\infty & \text{on $\Gout$} \\
&& \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial \hat{n}} &= 0  & \text{on $\Gout$} \\ 
&& \frac{\partial\vec{u}}{\partial\hat{n}} &= 0  & \text{on $\Gout$}
\end{align}
\end{document}
share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.