Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For my thesis I need to draw this:

enter image description here

With this code I could get everything except for the counter-ion (shown with red arrow, I do not need the red arrow and the line on the figure).

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
{
\setatomsep{2em}
\chemname{\chemfig{[:90]Ir?[o](-[,2]N*6(-=-=-(-*6(=*6(-=-=-)-=-=?[o,{<:}]-))=))([:-90]-[,2]N*6(-(-*6(-?[o,{<}]=-=*6(-=-=-)-=))=-=-=-))([:30]<:[,2]N*6(-(-*6(=N?[o,{<}]-=-(-([:30]-)(-)([:-90]-))=-))=-(-([:90]-)(-)([:-30]-))=-=))}}{1}
}
\end{figure}
\end{document}

Could you help me to find a way to solve this problem? It there only one way to do it with TikZ environment or is there a simpler way?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There is also a "simple" way without tikz using LaTeX's picture environment.

The first picture environment is used to place the counter-ion that is set by the second:

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
{
\setatomsep{2em}
\setlength{\unitlength}{2em}
\begin{picture}(0,0)
  \put(8.5,4.5){%
    \begin{picture}(0,0)
      \thicklines
      \put(.25,0){\makebox(0,0)[tl]{\chemfig{PF_{6}^{-}}}}
      \put(-1,0){\line(1,0){1}}
      \put(0,0){\line(0,-1){1}}
    \end{picture}%
  }
\end{picture}
\chemname{\chemfig{[:90]Ir?[o](-[,2]N*6(-=-=-(-*6(=*6(-=-=-)-=-=?[o,{<:}]-))=))([:-90]-[,2]N*6(-(-*6(-?[o,{<}]=-=*6(-=-=-)-=))=-=-=-))([:30]<:[,2]N*6(-(-*6(=N?[o,{<}]-=-(-([:30]-)(-)([:-90]-))=-))=-(-([:90]-)(-)([:-30]-))=-=))}}{1}
}
\end{figure}
\end{document}

Result

Remarks:

  • Some positioning for the counter-ion is necessary, but it can be relative to a atom of the molecule. Therefore the next solution is using tikz that is anyway loaded by package chemfig. This way, also an "one-liner" is possible. But using more lines would increase the readability.
  • I am missing the positive charge that makes the counter-ion a counter-ion. Or is the whole complex negative?
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
{
\setatomsep{2em}
\chemname{\chemfig{[:90]Ir?[o](-[,2]N*6(-=-=-(-*6(=*6(-=-=-)-=-=?[o,{<:}]-))=))([:-90]-[,2]N*6(-(-*6(-?[o,{<}]=-=*6(-=-=-)-=))=-=-=-))([:30]<:[,2]N*6(-(-*6(=N?[o,{<}]-=-(-([:30]-)(-)([:-90]-))=-))=-(-([:90]-@{tr})(-)([:-30]-))=-=))}}{1}
\chemmove{\draw[very thick,inner sep=0pt](tr)++(-1.5em,-.5em)--++(0,2em)node[anchor=north
west]{\,\chemfig{^{+}}\ \ \chemfig{PF_{6}^{-}}}--++(-2em,0);}
}
\end{figure}
\end{document}

Result

And finally a variant without manual positioning. The reference point is the top right corner of the top right branch of the molecule. For clarity I have used more lines:

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\setatomsep{2em}
\chemname{\chemfig{[:90]Ir?[o](-[,2]N*6(-=-=-(-*6(=*6(-=-=-)-=-=?[o,{<:}]-))=))
\chemmove{%
  \draw[
    very thick,
  ]
    (tr-|rt)
    ++(\pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}, \pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep})
    +(-2em,0) -- +(0,0)
      node [
        anchor=north west,
        inner sep=0pt
      ] {\,\printatom{^{+}}\ \printatom{PF_6^{-}}}
    --  +(0, -2em)
  ;%
}
\end{figure}
\end{document}

Result

share|improve this answer
1  
Is not it the same as with TikZ? I mean number of code lines and anyway you need to put position with hands:( –  saldenisov Feb 17 at 15:31
add comment

I've found a way. It was rather simple, but I've hoped that there is a special command for such thing, because there is one in chemdraw.

Here is the code:

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{chemfig,tikz}
\begin{document}

\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
{
\setatomsep{2em}
\chemname{\chemfig{[:90]Ir?[o](-[,2]N*6(-=-=-(-*6(=*6(-=-=-)-=-=?[o,{<:}]-))=))([:-90]-[,2]N*6(-(-*6(-?[o,{<}]=-=*6(-=-=-)-=))=-=-=-))([:30]<:[,2]N*6(-(-*6(=N?[o,{<}]-=-(-([:30]-)(-)([:-90]-))=-))=-(-([:90]-)(-)([:-30]-))=-=))}}{1}
\chemmove{\draw[line width=2pt](1cm,7.5)--(2,7.5)--(2,6.5);
\node[anchor=west] at (2,7.5) {$\rm PF_6^-$};}
}

\end{figure}
\end{document}

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
This seems not too bad: chemfig already loads tikz - why not use it? –  cgnieder Feb 17 at 15:35
2  
Instead of $\rm PF_6^-$ I'd write \printatom{PF_6^-}, though –  cgnieder Feb 17 at 15:42
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.