I want to have a double headed vector. I tried \overleftright, but the appearance is all but pretty. I would like to get the same kind of symbol, but with \vec appearance. Is it possible?

-

Built using stacks:

\documentclass{article}
\def\vecsign{\mathchar"017E}
\def\dvecsign{\smash{\stackon[-1.95pt]{\vecsign}{\rotatebox{180}{$\vecsign$}}}}
\def\dvec#1{\def\useanchorwidth{T}\stackon[-4.2pt]{#1}{\,\dvecsign}}
\usepackage{stackengine}
\stackMath
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
$\vec c \vec A \dvec c \dvec A$
\end{document}


There remains a slight possibility for overlap, when, for example, having $\dvec d \dvec b$. That issue can be remedied by using a little kern to make a narrower \dvec, as follows. To recover the original, reset \shrinkage to 0mu.

\documentclass{article}
\def\shrinkage{2.1mu}
\def\vecsign{\mathchar"017E}
\def\dvecsign{\smash{\stackon[-1.95pt]{\mkern-\shrinkage\vecsign}{\rotatebox{180}{$\mkern-\shrinkage\vecsign$}}}}
\def\dvec#1{\def\useanchorwidth{T}\stackon[-4.2pt]{#1}{\,\dvecsign}}
\usepackage{stackengine}
\stackMath
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
$\vec c \vec A \dvec c \dvec A$
$\dvec d \dvec b$
\end{document}


-
Because of my font election, I had to change -1.95 for -2.60, but your answer is abusuletly brilliant and elegant. – Alfredo Hernández Feb 25 '14 at 18:29
@AlfredoHernández Note that I added a \smash to \dvecsign else it had too much dead space above it. – Steven B. Segletes Feb 25 '14 at 18:30
Just wondering, is this possible to accomplish via \newcommand instead of \def? – Alfredo Hernández Feb 26 '14 at 21:01
Yeah, that's why I usually use \newcommand (just simple things, though). That worked nicely. – Alfredo Hernández Feb 26 '14 at 21:19