TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question led to a new feature in a package:

How to properly typeset Kröger Vink notation?

I can try something like \ce{V_O^{..}} (using mhchem) but the dots are not aligned well and too thin. I tried googling it and I can see people have done it but not how.

Edit to add MWE:

\ce{O_O^x + Zn_{Zn}^x <-> 1/2 O2 + Zn_$i$^. + e^{-1}}
share|improve this question
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please help us to help you and add a minimal working example (MWE) that illustrates your problem. It will be much easier for us to reproduce your situation and find out what the issue is when we see compilable code, starting with \documentclass{...} and ending with \end{document}. – Christian Hupfer Mar 23 '14 at 9:37
up vote 11 down vote accepted

Update: with version 4.5 (2014/04/08) chemformula has a basic native support for Kröger-Vink notation. It must be enabled with the option kroeger-vink=true:











\ch{O_O^x + Zn_{Zn}^x <-> 1/2 O2 + Zn_i^. + e^{-1}}


enter image description here

Original answer:

I've never heard from the Kröger Vink notation before... but from what a quick web search shows me the following should be correct. I use chemformula (from the chemmacros bundle) because it let's you customize the size of the dots and the amount of horizontal shift of superscripts:



  radical-radius = .3ex , % a larger `radical' dot
  charge-hshift  = 0pt    % don't shift superscripts to the right if subscripts
                          % are present








\ch{O_O^{$\times$} + Zn_{Zn}^{$\times$} <-> 1/2 O2 + Zn_i^. + e^{-1}}


enter image description here

A question related to the “dot” symbol is How to get the the dot symbol in Chemistry? which may give you some more hints

share|improve this answer
Just a small comment, though wikipedia gives the subscript i for interstitial as roman, it is more often seen as italic. ETA: I just checked IUPAC guide for nomenclature of inorganic chemistry and they use roman. – Henk Metselaar Mar 23 '14 at 10:36
Then _{$i$} would do – clemens Mar 23 '14 at 10:38
@HenkMetselaar Roman does make more sense: italics usually denote variables – clemens Mar 23 '14 at 13:53

When sticking with mhchem, simply swap _ and ^.


\ce{O^x_O + Zn^x_{Zn} <-> 1/2 O2 + Zn^._i + e^{-1}}

As for the size of the dots, they are still relatively thin with mhchem. If you have a collection of text books from different publishers and they all agree that these dots should be bigger, then contact the author and he surely will update the package.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.