TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How to put two figures side by side in a two-column document. figure* is not working.

share|improve this question
Related: Two figures side by side, Place figures side by side, spill into outer margin. Try the solutions there and replace figure with figure* for a two-column document. – Martin Scharrer Apr 28 '11 at 17:50
up vote 8 down vote accepted

I used subfigure package:

  \subfigure[random caption 1]{\includegraphics[scale=0.38]{image1}}\quad
  \subfigure[random caption 2]{\includegraphics[scale=0.38]{image2}}

Worked flawlessly :)

share|improve this answer
The subfigure package is the way to go if both are subfigure from one figure, i.e. a) and b) and should be labeled as such. However often two different, independent figures should be set side-by-side because of place limitations. Then your method doesn't work. You should prefer width for scale. I would also use \hfill instead of \quad to spread the two figure over the text width. – Martin Scharrer Apr 28 '11 at 17:46
That's true, but it does the job :) And I agree \hfill align the pictures better... – dingo_d Apr 28 '11 at 17:51
Not for me. The scaling has to be adjusted for each image and the horizontal alignment is not correct. I'm sorry, I just to pedantic in such things :-) – Martin Scharrer Apr 28 '11 at 17:57
The subfigure package is obsolete. One of its successors is subfig. – Thorsten Donig Apr 28 '11 at 17:58

This should do:

<Code for the first figure>
<Code for the second figure>
share|improve this answer
+1 That's the way I do it for two independent figures, i.e. there aren't subfigures. However I normally use width=.49\textwidth and \hfill not \qquad between them. Having a fixed distance is not a good idea IMHO. – Martin Scharrer Apr 28 '11 at 17:48
@Martin: this depends on the size of the figures; also, with just one \hfill in the middle the figures will go to the margins and maybe this is not wanted. However it was worth noting. – egreg Apr 28 '11 at 17:53
@egrep: Sorry, with width=.49\textwidth I meant using .49\textwidth in the width argument of minipage. Of course the width depends on the figures, someone might want to have e.g. 70-30 ratio, but I find .49-\hfill-.49 much better and less size dependent than .4-\qquad-.4. For me this doesn't push the figure in the margin: .49+.49=.98 => \hfill will be .02. Of course if the content is wider than the outer minipage than you are in trouble. IMHO using a fixed distance like \quad, \qquad or \hspace{...} causes more trouble, but I guess its also a matter of personal taste. – Martin Scharrer Apr 28 '11 at 18:03
Is there any way to \label then \ref the figures? – Geoff Jul 10 '12 at 14:55
@Geoff Isn't there a \label command? – egreg Jul 10 '12 at 15:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.