TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to enter in a footnote a reference to another footnote (in this case it's on the same page above).

I found out how I can create the reference, so that it is formatted like a "normal" footnote number (http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/16866/how-can-i-use-footnotemark-with-a-ref-argument), but how should I typeset it?

Is it ok like in the picture below (in english "see footnote" with a spacebetween the word "footnote" and the footnotemark?

Or how could that be done better?

  • Maybe without the space?
  • .. or even not as a footnotemark, but as a normal number (in normalsize)?


share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

In my opinion, you should use full-size numbers -- not only for references to footnotes, but also for the actual notes.

Quoting Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, p. 69:

4.3.3 Use superscripts in the text but full-size numbers in the notes themselves

In the main text, superscript numbers are used to indicate notes because superscript numbers minimize interruption. They are typographic asides: small because that is an expression of their relative importance, and raised for two reasons: to keep them out of the flow of the main text, and to make them easier to find. In the note itself, the number is not an aside but a target. Therefore the number in the note should be full size.

EDIT: Here's an example using the scrextend package which is part of KOMA-script:






share|improve this answer
thanks, that sounds convincing. Does this also correspond to German typographic conventions? BTW, I'd propose to use the KOMA-script class scrartcl in the example – MostlyHarmless Apr 28 '11 at 19:57
@Martin: I use KOMA-script classes, too -- I just wanted to point out that one may also use \deffootnote with the standard classes. As for German typographic conventions: Some are good, some are bad, and some (e.g. for footnotes) may be non-existent. – lockstep Apr 28 '11 at 20:01
a comment en passant: this convention about footnotes is enforced in the French rules for typography, as is seen when one employs \usepackage[french]{babel} – jfbu Apr 30 '11 at 13:52

Use the \deffootnote command as was given by Lockstep to change the footnote display. Regarding your question about the reference to a different footnote inside a footnote you can use the following \reffnmark command. Note that the * version gives the original mark and can be also be used to point intext footnotes to the same footnote (repeated footnote). I prefer the normal sized number to refere to a footnote, e.g. footnote (10).




This is a footnote test\footnote{first footnote\label{fn:first}}\par
Footnote\reffnmark*{fn:first} pointing to same footnote\par
Footnote\footnote{In footnote \reffnmark{fn:first} ...} with ref to first\par

share|improve this answer
Great solution! Is it possible to get a reference with the normal sized, non-superscript number /without/ parentheses? – Mårten Feb 4 '13 at 2:51
@Mårten: Yes, just rewrite the command \newcommand{\@reffnmark}[1]{\ref{#1}} by removing the parentheses. – Danie Els Feb 4 '13 at 5:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.