TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a problem with this expression:

$$n \geq \Bigg\lvert \bigcup_{l \leq |A_{i}| \leq 2l} |A_{i}| \Bigg\rvert \geq \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl \bigcup_{j =1}^{i-1} A_{j}\Biggr \Bigg\rvert$$

The report is:

`* Local config file bblopts.cfg used * ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\00miktex\bblopts.cfg") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\generic\babel\italian.ldf" ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\generic\babel\babel.def"))) (C:\Users\Stefano1\Desktop\Seminario\Seminario.aux) ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsa.fd") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsb.fd") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\base\omscmr.fd") [1{C:/ProgramData/MiKT eX/2.9/pdftex/config/pdftex.map}] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] ! Missing delimiter (. inserted). \bigcup@ l.296 ...}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl \bigcup {j =1}^{i-1} A{j}\Biggr ...

? `

I don't understand where is the error.

share|improve this question
Don't use $$. This is outdated. Use one $ for inline or \[ \] for display. – LaRiFaRi Apr 3 '14 at 9:11
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Both after one \Biggl and one \Biggr a delimiter, such as \lvert or \rvert or any other (parenthessis, brace, dot), is missing. There's just a blank and another command following.

Compilable example code:

  n \geq \Bigg\lvert \bigcup_{l \leq |A_{i}| \leq 2l} |A_{i}|
  \Bigg\rvert \geq \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl\lvert
  \bigcup_{j =1}^{i-1} A_{j}\Biggr\rvert \Bigg\rvert


share|improve this answer
As you just write, it would be great to have all \Bigg changed to \Biggl \Biggr and so on. – Manuel Apr 3 '14 at 10:08
I think the expression would look even better if you replaced all \Bigg directives with \bigg: Just as it's not desirable in general, to surround a summation sign with upper and lower limits with parentheses that fully enclose the entire expression, the vertical bars generated by \Bigg seem oppresively tall; switching to \bigg[lr] will give less visual prominence to the fences, without creating any uncertainty as to what's being enclosed. – Mico Apr 3 '14 at 11:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.