Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to define a "standard template" for drawing figures for my Ph. D. thesis. I would design large figures to fill the whole textwidth. Sometimes, however I have smaller figure, so that 2 (rarely 3) fit on "one line", and I also want to create a template for them with width<0.5 \textwidth resp. <0.33 \textwidth.

(I want to create all figures if possible in "real" size directly to avoid different font sizes later when they would be scaled by the \includegraphics[width=...] command).

I wondered how the width of the figures should be - compared to the textwidth. For large figures, the question was already discussed here Typographic conventions for width of figures in LaTeX data analysis reports and there was an interesting and detailed answer from Geoffrey Jones.

The question not discussed there is:

  • How much free horizontal space should be left between figures, of 2, 3 or 4 of them are shown as subfigures over the textwidth?

So:

  • Is there a typographic rule (or rule of thumb) stating, how much free space is at least "necessary" to visually separate different subfigures?
share|improve this question
    
I suspect there is no strict rule for this. Add as much space as needed to make it look good. I'd start with \quad and \qquad. This, of course, depends on how much border space do the figures have themselves. –  Andrey Vihrov May 8 '11 at 14:52
1  
sure, the border space is a very important point - it might be a difference, if the figure is a photograph or a line art with much white space around. –  Martin May 8 '11 at 15:05
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 10 down vote accepted

There are no fixed rules - not that I know of in any case. As I was working on something different when your question came up I am including some images to show you what looked right in this particular case.

In my eyes a single "em" space is more than enough. Spacing the figures apart makes the page look unbalanced.

enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here

In the first page the space between the figures is 5% of \textwidth, the rest one space. I prefer the more compact last ones. I suggest you experiment with different spacing to see what is right for you.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.