TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Which one should be used in limit, \rightarrow or \to?

share|improve this question
I use \to, it's nice and faster – Spike May 27 '11 at 6:47
it makes no difference – Herbert May 27 '11 at 6:51
I also use \to in limit, but I am not sure whether or not it is intentionally designed for that. – xport May 27 '11 at 6:51
With a good editor and good shorcuts, \righrarrowis more explicit and you can see the difference with \longrightarrow or \righrarrow. So it's depends of the user ! – Alain Matthes May 27 '11 at 7:28
I prefer \to since it reads like the math. – Will Sep 18 '12 at 1:57
up vote 19 down vote accepted

They are the same character. If you say \show\to and \show\rightarrow then both is \mathchar"3221. So use \to it is shorter

share|improve this answer
And in fontmath.ltx there's \let\to=\rightarrow. – egreg May 27 '11 at 7:56
In this case I'd rather recommend "Use the one that makes more sense semantically". – Martin Tapankov May 27 '11 at 13:13

In your document you should always use \to because it describes the meaning of what you're trying to write (i.e. a limit when x tends to some value).

In general its a good idea to prefer the use of commands which tell you the meaning of the symbol (in your particular context) and not just the name of the symbol.

For the very same reason I use


And then write A \lthen B for implication in logic formulas.

share|improve this answer
+1: Amazing just how many people don't understand this – Brent.Longborough May 27 '11 at 18:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.