TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have been working with tables spanned over multiple pages as well as I want "x" functionality as well. I have been successfully working with tabularx (along with threeparttable) for now. It seems to me that there isn't any table type which one can do using one package can't be done using another package. So, can we just assume that tabularx and ltablex can replace each other and there is no advantages one offer over another? I am inquisitive what are the pros and cons of one package over another. Any insightful comments would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
Your write-up is, I'm afraid, a bit confusing. In particular, the tabularx environment cannot (at least by itself) span multiple pages. Please clarify your objective. – Mico Jul 19 '14 at 7:54
@Mico I meant tabularx + threeparttable can span pages. No any specific advantages of ltablex + threeparttable over ltablex and vice versa? – Sumit Jul 19 '14 at 12:23
More precisely, it is threepartablex that allows for splitting across pages. – Bernard Jul 19 '14 at 13:00

The X functionality in ltablex is implemented by tabularx and the multipage functionality in ltablex is implemented by longtable. ltablex just includes both packages and supplies a bit of glue so they work better together.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.