TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Preliminary Theorem 1.1.2. If $(\lambda_1,...,\lambda_n)$, $(\mu_1,...,\mu_n)$, 
and $(k_1,...,k_n)$ are arrangements of $(1,...,n),$ then \begin{flalign*}
&\epsilon\bordermatrix{&\cr&\lambda_1,...,\lambda_n \cr&\mu_1,...,\mu_n 
\cr}=\epsilon\bordermatrix{&\cr&\lambda_{k_1},...,\lambda_{k_1} \cr&\mu_{k_1},...,\mu_n \cr}. \end{flalign*}
share|improve this question
Note that \bordermatrix is a very special construction, which shouldn't generally be used, unless you really need to add names for rows and columns; the extra vertical space you get is exactly the space reserved for the column names. – egreg Aug 25 '14 at 11:05
up vote 4 down vote accepted

You better use pmatrix:


Preliminary Theorem 1.1.2. If $(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n)$, $(\mu_1,\dots,\mu_n)$,
and $(k_1,\dots,k_n)$ are arrangements of $(1,\dots,n),$ then
     \lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n \\
    \lambda_{k_1},\dots,\lambda_{k_1} \\

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
Use \dots and not ... – egreg Aug 25 '14 at 10:54
@egreg Yes, I always overlook something!, may be I am too focussed ;-). Thanks for noting. – Harish Kumar Aug 25 '14 at 11:01
To Harish, Thank you so very much for your demonstration. The BEST part of your illustration is the introduction of pmatrix. I did not know it for I am new to LaTex. Once again thank you! – Nisal Kevin Kotinkaduwa Aug 25 '14 at 11:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.