Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If picins is not free, why does it exist in MikTeX?

share|improve this question
3  
TexLive's team is strict, only packages with a certain kind of licence are accepted in TL. MikTeX and TeXLive are not equivalent. picins is free but I think it's a problem of licence –  Alain Matthes Jun 7 '11 at 12:57
    
Note that in theory the licence conditions for inclusion in MikTeX are the same as for TeX Live, according to the first paragraph of <miktex.org/copying>; (compare with <tug.org/texlive/LICENSE.TL>). However, examples such as this one show that this common policy is not as actively enforced in MikTeX as in TeX Live. –  mpg Jun 8 '11 at 6:10
    
And btw picins is not free for any commonly accepted definition of free/libre software since you cannot modify it without author's permission and it doesn't even have a licence statement about distribution. –  mpg Jun 8 '11 at 6:12

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

It seems to be due to licensing issues and the package author being unavailable. See the following thread and especially the post in the link: [tex-live] picins is missing from tex-live .

Also, on why it's in MikTeX. On their homepage it doesn't say anything about the license of picins (it's silent about version and maintainer too). So, to connect with a comment above, it seems they are not as strict as TeX Live when it comes to these things.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.