TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is the LaTeX-package caption compatible with KOMAscript-classes like scrreprt?

(I did not find anything about that in the KOMAscript-Manual, but as KOMAscript redefines a lot for the floats and captions, I wonder if there might be problems.)

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

See section 5.4 of the caption manual for an overview of the interplay between KOMA-script and caption. Quoting the "Side effects":

The optional argument of \setcapwidth is not supported and will be ignored if used in conjunction with the caption package. Furthermore the KOMA-Script options tablecaptionabove & tablecaptionbelow and the commands \captionabove & \captionbelow are stronger than the position= setting offered by the caption package.

share|improve this answer
Please note that the version 3.1 of the caption package is not adapted to the new features of KOMA-Script3 yet. So currently using \DeclareCaptionType is not recommended since it does not integrate the new floating environments into the new KOMA-Script features, better use \DeclareNewTOC instead. Futhermore \captionaboveof and \captionbelowof are not supported by the caption package yet, and the caption package is not aware of the tocbasic package yet. (This will change in version 3.2 of the caption package.) – Axel Sommerfeldt Jul 3 '11 at 9:31
BTW: As a general rule one can say: If there is a solution offered by KOMA-Script, and a one offered by the caption package, better use the KOMA-Script one. – Axel Sommerfeldt Jul 3 '11 at 9:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.