Using \colon gives correct spacing for a map $F\colon C\to D$ in one direction. But writing $L\colon C\rightleftarrows D\colon R$ for a couple of maps in both directions (e.g. for an adjunction) gives disturbingly asymmetric spaces near first and second colons (like if D were a map from R, not the other way round). Probably, it should be fixed (e.g. some other command should be used) — but how?
Tell me more
×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
||||
| show 2 more comments |
|
|
|||
|
\cocolon! It should be just\lon(and the opposite of the coefficient ring should be ...). – Andrew Stacey Aug 25 '10 at 11:18\colonpreferred over:? I just checked a random sample of books in my office and the overwhelming majority uses the symmetrical spacing of:. The exceptions (among the 15 or so books I checked) are Atiyah-MacDonald, Besse and Kobayashi-Nomizu. I have to admit that I never sat down to think about this before. – José Figueroa-O'Farrill Aug 25 '10 at 12:01