Playfair's axiom\footnote{%
so called in honor of mathematician John Playfair, etc, etc.,
but was actually discovered by Proclus\footnotemark}
\footnotetext{Greek mathematician, etc, etc.}
But I'd advise against doing this.
As a bonus, here's an example of how you can really mess with footnotes.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\footnotetext[4]{We have to go back to the future, Marty!}
Foo\footnote{The footnote to this sentence is true\footnotemark}
\footnotetext{The footnote to this sentence is false\footnotemark[1]}
more body text\footnotetext[42]{This footnote doesn't appear in the main text}
And more body text\footnote{And we're back to the normal numbering.}
But look where this footnote text ends up!\footnotemark
\end{document}
A few points.
- The footnotes appear in the order the
\footnotemarks appear in the text.
- Optional arguments to both
\footnotemark and \footnotetext give you control over what number actually appears. (Useful for repeating a footnote if it is relevant again later.
- Everything here should work perfectly with
\label and \ref
\footnotemarkand\footnotetexttrickery should do it, but like @Seamus I would do it. – Martin Scharrer♦ Jul 15 '11 at 23:46bigfootdoes this (example given in the manual). It is not a normal need, but critical editions which themselves include a scholarly apparatus may make such a situation necessary. – jon Nov 27 '11 at 4:32