TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have an equation like this:

      P(A \cup B) = \sum_{\omega \in A \cup B} P(\omega) = \sum_{\omega \in A} P(\omega) + \sum_{\omega \in B} P(\omega)
      = P(A) + P(B)

For some reason, LaTeX is automatically labeling the equation. How do I turn that off? Secondly how do I write something in LaTeX on this site. I tried enclosing in '$' but it doesn't work.

share|improve this question
If by "how do I write something in latex on this site" you mean that you want to write something in latex syntax to be automatically converted into HTML (as some other SE sites do), then you can't. For more on this, read the following discussion on meta: meta.tex.stackexchange.com/questions/7/we-need-tex-markup – Loop Space Sep 1 '10 at 11:43
up vote 64 down vote accepted

Do a \begin{align*} - \end{align*}. That should do the trick.

share|improve this answer
The "*" versions of the equation environments suppress numbers. This is true for align, but also for AMS environments equation, gather, multline, and flalign. – András Salamon Sep 1 '10 at 20:17
On a side note, one needs to include {amsmath} package by \usepackage{amsmath} for * environments – Nishant Nov 12 '15 at 19:48

If you only want some of the lines in an align environment to not be numbered, just put \nonumber before the end characters on each of the lines you don't want to have numbers. Otherwise, use align* as JCL suggested so that none of the lines will be numbered.

share|improve this answer
I think you mean \notag. – TH. Sep 15 '10 at 10:57
I've never used \notag, but perhaps that works also. – Rebekah Sep 15 '10 at 11:37
I think this is to be preferred; it's the way intended by Latex. – Yan King Yin May 12 '15 at 0:02

As a sidenote, the mathtools package, which makes some improvements on amsmath, provides a way of labeling only those equations that are referenced in the text.

enter image description here

  a = b \label{eq1} \\  
  c = d \label{eq2}  
Some text, \eqref{eq2}.  

In this case, only the second of the equations, c = d, is numbered, as that is the only one being referenced in the text.


  • three compiler passes are required for the references to show up properly
  • this does not work with cleveref, but the cleveref manual mentions another package, autonum, that performs the same task, yet is compatible with cleveref.
  • the manual of the present version (dated 2012/05/10) notes two bugs, one can cause that the number is printed close to, or on top of, the equation, the other relates to ntheorem. Refer to the manual for details.
share|improve this answer

Note whilst the above answers are relevant to the question, a lot of people include equations in LaTeX using the \begin{equation} which works without explicitly including the amsmath package in a LaTeX document. However when one attempts to the use \begin{equation*} directive (to omit numbering) an error is generated. Thus in this case it should be pointed out that one needs to explicitly import the amsmath package:

share|improve this answer

If you use this:


try this instead:

share|improve this answer

"\nonumber" sometimes does not work for me. Another possibility is to do:

$ P(A \cup B) = \sum_{\omega \in A \cup B} P(\omega) = \sum_{\omega \in A}
P(\omega) + \sum_{\omega \in B} P(\omega) = P(A) + P(B) $
share|improve this answer
Please be a bit more specific about the circumstances when "\nonumber ... doesn't work for me". You should probably insert a \displaymath directive immediately after the opening $ symbol so that the \sum symbols will be set in "large" mode, as this is the generally expected behavior for displayed equation. A downside to your proposed method is that the vertical spacing above and below a center environment is not likely to be the same as for displayed equations. – Mico Jan 4 '14 at 21:10
I would strongly advise against this method, as math typeset in text-mode (ie. using $) and set in display-mode (ie. using a dedicated environment) have quite different spacing to the text above and below. On top of that, certain characters are typeset differently, as @Mico mentions, and even though \displaymath takes care of this, the spacing will remain wrong. – spet Mar 5 '14 at 7:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.