I have a paper where I have to use both \Box and \blacksquare. The two symbols do not have the same height. I could use \square from amssymb but I do not like the size of \square and \blacksquare and I would prefer to scale down \blacksquare to the same size as \Box. Both will be used in normal math text and as subscript size.
|
|
||||
|
|
|
If you want to create your own filled square you could use, for example, For example (illustrative only and including the MnSymbol items for comparison),
The main disadvantage of the approach is that the symbol does not change size if the text around it changes size (as is evident from defining two versions). You could work round that by defining the size of the symbol in terms of a variable, perhaps ex height or, better (as Barbara Beeton suggests), the actual size of \Box. FootnoteWith The definitions of medium square and medium filled square in mnsymbol/Sym-Geometric.mf are the same size:
but an empty square and a filled one will tend to look different sizes by eye. |
|||||
|