Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to prepare a print-ready pdf file for a book. The publisher is complaining that horizontal lines (in particular, the lines separating headers and footers from the body, but I think it also happens for fraction bars) are showing up as low-resolution images (less than 72 dpi). I think that the following should be the relevant part of the preamble:

\documentclass[11pt]{book}

\usepackage{ifthen}

\usepackage[paper height=9.21in, paperwidth=6.14in, top=.95in, bottom=.95in, 
inner=.75in, outer=.75in, head height=.6in, =.4in]{geometry}

I am compiling the document to a dvi file, and then converting it to a postscript file using

dvips -R -Poutline  -o filename.ps filename.dvi

The postscript file is then converted to a pdf file using Adobe Acrobat on the PDF/X-1a:2001 setting. I should also note that the document does contain a large number of actual images, all of which are included as eps files and have sufficiently high resolution.

How can I make the horizontal lines come out as having resolution at least 72 dpi? (At least 300 dpi would be ideal.)

Speculation: I can imagine that the -D option in dvips might be relevant, but I don't actually know, and I don't have an easy way to detect the results if I start playing around with it.

share|improve this question
    
I really don't know what tags are appropriate here. If someone does, please re-tag. –  Charles Staats Sep 9 '11 at 3:10
3  
The Command Line Option Details of the dvips documentation mentions the -P <printer> specifies a config.<printer> configuration file which option sets (amongst other things) the resolution. Perhaps something contained in config.outline is causing this drop in resolution? –  Werner Sep 9 '11 at 5:12
1  
Re detecting the results: pdfimages may help - it will extract lines which are rendered as bitmap images for some reason but not vectors. –  Ant Sep 12 '11 at 11:10
2  
Further to my previous comment: pdfimages reveals that, with the workflow as above but using ps2pdf instead of Acrobat, both fraction bars and horizontal rules are rendered as a 1x1 black image which is stretched to the required size - hence the error with resolution. I'm not sure where in the process this is introduced - the PostScript file is not very friendly to my (relatively inexperienced) eyes. I did notice, however, that when the file is compiled directly with pdflatex the lines are rendered correctly as vectors - would this be an option for you? –  Ant Sep 12 '11 at 11:30
1  
One final note: I believe the distinction between vector and bitmap images in this case is academic - in both cases the instruction is to fill a particular area of the page with a single colour. I.e., despite the publishers' software complaining about low resolution, the lines should look as intended when output at any resolution. –  Ant Sep 12 '11 at 11:32
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

To repeat my comment above for the sake of writing a reasonably coherent answer, the reason your publishers' software is complaining is that both fraction bars and horizontal rules are being rendered as a 1x1 black image stretched to the required size.

This is caused by the dvips configuration you're using. If you keep the same workflow, but replace -Poutline with -Ppdf when running dvips, the horizontal lines are rendered correctly. (The pdf configuration is actually a superset of outline, so you're not losing anything from the configuration you had.)

(Edited to add: as a matter of fact, it turns out the only detail you need from config.pdf is D 8000: running

dvips -D8000 -Poutline whatever.dvi

is enough to make this work. -D600 - i.e., a resolution of only 600 dpi - is not. I haven't experimented to see what the cutoff value is!)

Perhaps worth mentioning: alternative workflows would include using pdflatex in the first place, and using dvipdfm to go straight from DVI to PDF.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! Also, thanks for the tip about pdfimages. The publisher very strongly recommends that pdf files be compiled using Adobe Distiller (on a particular setting), which is why I am going through dvips. –  Charles Staats Sep 13 '11 at 4:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.