Suppose I have two tables that don't have many columns (3, for example). How can I position them side by side?
|
If you want two
Loading the If you'd like 'sub'tables, then you can use the
Note that in both cases I've used a |
|||||||||
|
|
Just put two
If you want to use
If you want two tables that are independent, and thus don't want to use
This is basically the same as before just that I've centered each |
||||
|
|
|
Ceteris paribus, you might consider the subfig package. It is suitable for subtables and subfigures and combinations of these. For myself, I've managed much mileage from it. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
I don't know that this is the best way, but you could make a 2-column table with a single row. In each cell of the table, wrap one of your intended tables in a minipage environment. Thus:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|


minipage, subfig & subfloat, \quad (?), parbox, subcaption & subtable. Is there a consensus of what's considered best, if both "subtables" also have some basic (not a fully-fledged one with the "Table 2.1"-bit) caption? – nutty about natty Apr 18 at 5:59