# Porting LaTeX packages to ConTeXt modules

From seeing quite a few questions here, it seems ConTeXt is often able to easily address problems that LaTeX has a hard time with. I'd be willing to give it a try, but there is one package that I depend heavily on, which is bibleref and is not ported to ConTeXt (that I know of).

How hard is it to port LaTeX packages to ConTeXt modules? What are the things to know when doing so?

-
Very close: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28013/… –  Andrey Vihrov Sep 16 '11 at 6:07
@Andrey: Yes, I saw this one. It is close indeed, but it doesn't answer my question. –  ℝaphink Sep 16 '11 at 6:14
There are no LaTeX modules, just LaTeX packages. ConTeXt calls them modules. So it should be "Porting LaTeX packages to ConTeXt modules" –  Martin Scharrer Sep 16 '11 at 6:29
@Martin: thanks, fixed. –  ℝaphink Sep 16 '11 at 6:39