Sign up ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am new to LaTeX. I am trying to write a paper using latex. I want a footnote about the funding source of my work in the first page without marker.

I tried below approaches:

  1. \footnotetext{text goes here} This creates a footnote but with '0' as marker. However, the marker reference does not appear within the normal text where I placed this command.

  2. Used \def\blfootnote{\xdef\@thefnmark{}\@footnotetext} definition provided at I placed this definition in the main tex file just after package declaration. But, this gives the below error.

       ! Use of \@ doesn't match its definition.
       \blfootnote ->\xdef \@thefnmark{}\@f
share|improve this question
Welcome to! You don't have to sign with your name since it automatically appears in the lower right corner of your post. You can use backticks ` to mark your inline code as I did in my edit. –  Joseph Wright Oct 6 '11 at 18:54
Additional to/instead of posting a “Thank you” as comment, it would be nice to upvote some answer(s) (with the upward pointing arrow to the left of it - if you did not do so already). More than one answer to a question can be upvoted). Since you have two responses below that seem to answer your question, please consider marking one of them as ‘Accepted’ by clicking on the tickmark below their vote count. This shows which answer helped you most, and it assigns reputation points to the author of the answer (and to you!). –  Stephen Oct 30 '11 at 18:32

4 Answers 4

As Stephen mentioned in his answer, if you're using your definition in your .tex file, you need to enclose it inside \makeatletter, \makeatother. Another option not involving the use of the special character @ (thus not requiring \makeatletter, \makeatother) would be to locally redefine \thefootnote (taking care of correcting the footnote counter):




Some text\blfootnote{A footnote without marker} and some more text\footnote{A standard footnote}


enter image description here

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the responses guys. Just looked at your suggestions, but was able to have the footnote working just sometime ago. The problem was that I had to keep the definition of blfootnote in the class file instead of the tex file. –  Rajesh Oct 6 '11 at 19:18
@Rajesh: as Stephen mentioned in his answer, enclosing your definition with \makeatletter, \makeatother you can keep the definition in the .tex file. See also my updated answer for another option not involving internal commands. –  Gonzalo Medina Oct 6 '11 at 19:21
What does "bl" in "blfootnote" stand for? –  David Doria Oct 24 '12 at 15:14
@DavidDoria: Gonazalo is re-implementing a macro that the original poster copied from a resource that is no longer available. So we'll never know what bl stands for. One may guess “blind”, but the important think is that it be different from \footnote. –  Matthew Leingang Dec 4 '14 at 16:36

@ is a special character in (La)TeX. Enclose your code with \makeatletter, \makeatother:


Edit (from my former comments):

Internal commands with @ can be used without \makeatletter and \makeatother in the class file (as you found out) as well as in style files, too. Only in the .tex file the "envelope" is needed. That said, I would prefer Gonzalo Medina's answer over my own (or your placement of the redefinition in the class file) because it only locally redefines footnote (respectively give a new command for unnumbered footnotes).

When you are using the hyperref package, you would probably want to add \addtocounter{Hfootnote}{-1}% to the code of GM, otherwise it will work but error messages about (hyper)footnotes will become tricky, because e.g. Hfootnote 42 then is footnote 41 - use \addtocounter{footnote}{-1} without \addtocounter{Hfootnote}{-1} for several cases, and the difference between footnote and Hfootnote makes debugging harder than necessary.

Edit (again):

As suggested by egreg, I changed \xdef (=\global\edef) to \gdef (=\global\def), because there is no need to *e*xpand the *def*inition's content here (as it is just empty).

share|improve this answer
\xdef should be \gdef; it doesn't make any difference here, it could in other situations. –  egreg Oct 30 '11 at 18:53
+1, @Gonzalo Medina solution doesn't work 'well' with hyperref package, it lets an empty link box to the footnote! –  Kevin Oct 29 '14 at 10:23

In some cases, you might want to suppress the number on a footnote. I looked around the web, and a few suggestions were out there, but the simplest one I could find was the following:

\let\thefootnote\relax\footnotetext{Put your text here}
share|improve this answer
This may work, but it is not really LaTeX style and may have serious side-effects, e.g., when switching back to normal footnotes. –  jknappen Sep 1 at 12:56
Welcome to TeX.SX! A tip: You can use backticks ` to mark your inline code. I did not edit your answer just for this detail, you might want to change it yourself. –  Philipp Imhof Sep 1 at 12:56

There’s also an old package, titlefoot, which has no documentation except a few comments in the .sty file. It provides a command, \unmarkedfntext{...}, which has never caused problems in my documents. A little example:

\title{My Brilliant Article}
\maketitle\unmarkedfntext{Originally published by Oxford.}

\blindtext\footnote{It seems to play well with hyperref.}
share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.