TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Basically there are three possibilities:

  1. add just a 'Acknowledgement' section as last section of you introduction chapter
  2. put it at the end - between the last appendix and the bibliography
  3. put it after the abstract page and before the table of contents

I see 1 a lot in books and 2 a lot in thesis documents. 3 is suggested by the KOMA guide (not - see edit).

To implement 3 I would just use a second abstract environment in KOMA script (with a redefined abstract name):


How would you implement the third choice?

What is the best choice from an aesthetic/type-setting point of view?

Edit: Uh, I mixed up the numbers regarding the KOMA guide. The guide actually recommends 2:

Acknowledgements in the introduction? No, the proper acknowledgements can be found in the addendum. My comments here are not intended for the authors of this guide — and those thanks should rightly come from you, the reader, anyhow. I, the author of KOMA - Script, would like to extend my personal thanks to Frank Neukam.[..]

Hm, 'Special Thanks' vs. 'Acknowledgements' ...

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Does your institution not specify where to put an acknowledgement section for your thesis? Usually they have pretty draconian rules about that sort of thing. Personally, I think that 2 seems like a terrible choice for a thesis. For papers, you typically have acknowledgement, bibliography, appendices, in that order. For a thesis, the acknowledgements should be in the front matter.

For example, one thesis guideline I'm looking at right now shows dedication, epigraph, table of contents, lists of {abbreviations, figures, schemes, tables, etc.}, preface, acknowledgements, vita, abstract, introduction, etc. So that's similar to 3 except that the abstract comes a long way after table of contents in the front matter.

I guess I don't really have an opinion about 1.

share|improve this answer
In the USA, institutions typically have draconian (and often impressively ugly) requirements for thesis formatting. In Europe, it is much more flexible, and up to the student to decide. – Lev Bishop Sep 19 '10 at 1:40
@Lev Bishop: +1 for impressively ugly. =/ – TH. Sep 19 '10 at 2:00
Tes, my (european) institution does not specify it. But this really depends on your institution or faculty - even in europe ;) – maxschlepzig Sep 24 '10 at 9:12

I put it next to the colophon (yes, I have a colophon. I’m vain that way) in the appendix.

A colophon holds information about the software and fonts used to produce a document. I think it’s somewhat fitting to put the acknowledgements next to it since both are a list of “entities” that supported you in producing the text.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.