Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Background

As discussed in this question, one would often like to use small caps for abbreviations, however, mixed case acronyms such as OpenMP look rather odd (see example 2 below):

rendered example

The problem is that most fonts provided with LaTeX (and most of the fonts bundled with an OS) provide only a single small cap shape that is so close to the x-height of the font that there is insufficient height contrast to distinguish the small caps from the lower case letters. (The "O" looks almost like a lower-case "o" but with a strange weight in this example previous example.)

The typographic solution is to use a font with mid-capitals (mid-caps) – capitals with a weight similar to small caps but with a height somewhat larger than the x-height of the font, but relatively few fonts support this. Many fonts do provide real small caps.

Question

How can I fake mid-caps in a font that has x-height small caps within LaTeX?

Discussion

Of course, the best solution is to use a properly designed font, or to use a program like FontForge to add these to the font (provided that the font license permits modification), but this can be a lot of work and is impractical in many situations (such as submitting an article to the arXiv, so I am looking for a programatic solution within LaTeX or pdfLaTeX. (Excellent XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX solutions may be of interest generally, but will not satisfy the arXiv need.) Here are several possible solutions:

  1. A simple solution is to scale down the full caps. This works even for fonts that do not provide small caps, but is not acceptable typographically. I do not consider this a potential solution.

    Edit: As Barbara Beeton points out, Knuth's original Computer Modern fonts have multiple design sizes, so scaling by a full step size as done by the \SMC macro in ltugboat.cls does a much better job with these fonts than one would first expect. If your fonts have multiple design sizes (sometimes called optical sizes, or multiple masters), then this scaling might be acceptable. (See also selecting optical size.)

  2. The simplest acceptable solution is to scale up the small caps. As long as the scale factor is not too large (less than 105% or so), then this is reasonable, but not ideal solution. An implementation using the relsize package is provided below. The problem with this solution is that some fonts need even more scaling, and even scaling up from small caps increases the visual weight too much.
  3. A better solution that I do not presently see how to implement is to provided a different horizontal and vertical scale factor. The weight of the font can be better maintained with a vertical scaling of 107% for example but a horizontal scaling of 105% (see this discussion). One could implement this with scaleboxes for each letter, but I suspect this might have spacing/performance problems. (Maybe the scaling could be done once in the preamble, and cached in a precompiled preamble?)
  4. The best automatic solution would probably be to interpolate between the small caps and full caps. This should provide an excellent way to preserve the weight even for large scaling factors. Is this possible programatically? (This is how I would start trying to design a set of mid-caps using an external program like FontForge.)

Here is an implementation of 1 to 3:

\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{relsize}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\renewcommand\RSpercentTolerance{0}
\newcommand{\mcfactor}{1.07}
\usepackage[tracking=smallcaps]{microtype}
\SetTracking{encoding=*, shape=sc}{25}
\usepackage[sc]{mathpazo}

\newcommand\fakesc[1]{{\relscale{0.8}\MakeUppercase{#1}}}
\newcommand\relsc[1]{{\relscale{1.09}\textsc{#1}}}
\newcommand\fullsc[1]{\scalebox{1.06}[1.09]{\textsc{#1}}}

\begin{document}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[0. ] Some text for visual context \textsc{o}pen\textsc{mp} followed by
  some more text.
\item[1. ] Some text for visual context \fakesc{o}pen\fakesc{mp} followed by
  some more text.
\item[2. ] Some text for visual context \relsc{o}pen\relsc{mp} followed by
  some more text.
\item[3. ] Some text for visual context \fullsc{o}pen\fullsc{mp} followed by
  some more text.
\end{enumerate}
\end{document}

samples of methods 1 to 3

These are probably not the optimal parameters for Palatino, but give a flavour of the problem. Option 0 is the standard small caps option. The capitals are way to small for the needed contrast. Option 1 uses scaled full-caps: the height is nice but the letters have become too thin. Option 2 uses scaled small caps at 109%. This is still not quite enough, but even here the horizontal weight is becoming too heavy. Option 3 scales horizontally by only 106% which looks better. Unfortunately, even more contrast would be better, but to keep the weight under control distorts the letters too much. Can anyone implement the interpolation (option 4)? I really think that would work best.

share|improve this question
4  
the tugboat journal has used "mid-caps" for years. take a look at the file ltugboat.cls and the definitions of \acro and `\textSMC'. for input, only letters typed in uppercase are "smallified", but that's what i think you want. –  barbara beeton Jan 17 '12 at 13:38
    
@barbarabeeton Thanks for pointing that out! ltugboat.cls implements my first option, scaling the uppercase letters down by one size step. Unfortunately, they end up looking a little thin as I discussed. –  mforbes Jan 17 '12 at 20:07
1  
since cm has multiple design sizes, the thinning isn't as bad as it would be with a font that can be scaled only linearly. too bad multiple master fonts are pretty much extinct ... –  barbara beeton Jan 17 '12 at 20:21
    
@barbarabeeton Of course - I forgot about that. Do you recall the original design intent of the multiple sizes? They still look a little thin to me for this use (on screen: I really should print out a copy). –  mforbes Jan 17 '12 at 20:31
1  
multiple sizes in cm? to emulate "real" (i.e. metal) type, so that footnotes and superscripts wouldn't look spindly (and disappear with the third photocopying), and large title sizes wouldn't be overwhelming (they're narrower, though not necessarily much thinner). basically the same reason that "designed" small caps have thicker strokes than the scaled base letters. –  barbara beeton Jan 17 '12 at 20:38

1 Answer 1

I don't think I have a full answer but I found myself with a similar problem one day and solved it using bold versions of smaller fonts. For som fonts it works and for some it doesn't. This is where you skill and taste comes into effect. Here is my case where I think it works: (the \hskips are cause it's an abbreviation)

\documentclass[12pt]{memoir}
\usepackage[osf]{mathpazo}

\begin{document}
    \newcommand{\inchi}{%
                            \mbox{\textsc{i}%
        \hskip 0.1 em {\scriptsize \textbf{n}}%
        \hskip 0.1 em {\normalsize \textsc{c}}%
        \hskip 0.1 em {\scriptsize \textbf{h}}%
        \hskip 0.1 em {\normalsize \textsc{i}}%
        }
    }
    Lorem ipsum \inchi dolor\ldots
\end{document}

rendering of the code above

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.