TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

At the moment, I am using mathspec and some traditional math packages such as mathpazo to typeset my mathematics. The results are mostly satisfactory, but I would like to expand the repertoire of some of the math alphabets by replacing the traditional packages with fragments of Unicode math fonts; in particular I want to be able to use the blackboard bold letters and numbers from STIX for \mathbb.

Now, the problem with using the unicode-math package is that it is totally incompatible with traditional math packages: it insists on replacing all the existing math symbol macros with Unicode ones even when no Unicode math font has been selected yet. I am not yet prepared to switch over to Unicode math as my main mathematics typesetting system, as it is very hard to get it to reproduce my current output. Yet, unicode-math seems to be the only way of using fragments of Unicode math fonts in the way that I want; the \setmathxxx commands from mathspec expect old-style fonts with the styled glyphs in the Basic Latin block.

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Hmm, sorry for the slow reply here and for the brief answer. The answer is unfortunately not :)

share|improve this answer
I suspected as much. Oh well. Hopefully there will be more unicode-math fonts to choose from in the future! – Zhen Lin Aug 5 '12 at 10:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.