TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does BibTeX (ore one of its variants) have a dictionary entry?

I have not been able to find much on this respect after a few searches on google and here.

share|improve this question
up vote 17 down vote accepted

biblatex offers the collection entry type as well as the more specific reference type. Quoting section 2.1.1 of the biblatex manual:


A single-volume collection with multiple, self-contained contributions by distinct authors which have their own title. The work as a whole has no overall author but it will usually have an editor.

Required fields: editor, title, year/date



A single-volume work of reference such as an encyclopedia or a dictionary. This is a more specific variant of the generic @collection entry type. The standard styles will treat this entry type as an alias for @collection.

Both entry types feature multi-volume variants, mvcollection and mvreference.

share|improve this answer

There is no explicit entry type called @dictionary in BibTeX (or biblatex, AFAICT). However, the entry type @book should provide sufficiently many fields for you to enter the information you need to store. For more on BibTeX's entry types see, e.g., the BibTeX manual.

share|improve this answer

Probably many people (myself included) have this problem. I did many Google searches too and just arrived at a partial solution I think will suffice in my case (I needed to reference a particular entry). This is what I ended doing:

  1. as I'm using APA style, considered this model:

    Internet. (2009). In Encyclopaedia Britannica (Vol. 20, pp. 81-82). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.


  2. with this in mind, used the following (case-specific, of course):

        publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
        author = {Rationality.},
        title = {{The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy}},
        year = {1999},

    And got:

    Rationality. (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

I'll let

share|improve this answer
Wouldn't it be better to somehow crossref this so that you could have multiple quotations from a dictionary without retyping? – user1603472 Oct 6 '15 at 21:21

Best way to do it (it works on iPad very well) is to ignore the author and editor trait. and go for:

  title = {A {D}ictionary of {P}hysics (6th {E}dition)},
  note = {Compton Effect},
  year = {2012},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},

In that way you will not run into awkward descriptions when it is included in PocketBib for instance (or similar) and the reader can see that he must look up the trait. The example above is for a reference I used for an article abou the Compton Effect.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.