Does BibTeX (ore one of its variants) have a dictionary entry?
I have not been able to find much on this respect after a few searches on google and here.
|
|
|
Both entry types feature multi-volume variants, |
||||
|
|
|
Best way to do it (it works on iPad very well) is to ignore the author and editor trait. and go for:
In that way you will not run into awkward descriptions when it is included in PocketBib for instance (or similar) and the reader can see that he must look up the trait. The example above is for a reference I used for an article abou the Compton Effect. |
||||
|
|
|
Probably many people (myself included) have this problem. I did many Google searches too and just arrived at a partial solution I think will suffice in my case (I needed to reference a particular entry). This is what I ended doing:
I'll let |
||||
|
|
|
There is no explicit entry type called |
||||
|
|