Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I like using natbib for my author-year-style citations, but since I mainly write in swedish it would be nice if mine bibliography would be in swedish as well.

Can natbib be persuaded to speak in swedish instead of english? Or should I go for another author-year citation package instead?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

I would use biblatex instead.

share|improve this answer
    
Their manual is horrible. It needs to be restructured. But after pulling some hair and experimenting some more I made it work like I wanted. Thanks! –  Oscar Oct 18 '10 at 15:50
    
I've always found that the biblatex manual is very good: perhaps you might elaborate on what is wrong with it. –  Joseph Wright Nov 1 '10 at 19:58
add comment

This is a function of you bibliography style file and bibtex, not of natbib. This FAQ answer discusses multilingual bibliographies. In particular it talks about the swebib bundle of Swedish versions of the standard bibliography styles, including plainnat.

You can also use makebst (from custom-bib package) to make natbib-compatible bst files in a "wizard" workflow. One of the questions you get asked during this process allows you to choose to make multilingual bibliographies that are babel compatible. See this FAQ answer.

share|improve this answer
add comment

It's not clear to me that natbib the package does anything with respect to language when it comes to the bibliography entries. It seems like you should be able to make minimal modifications to the bibliography style (.bst) to produce Swedish text instead of English text.

Additionally, natbib works with babel so that should display "Bibliography" or "References" correctly (I think). Or you can just redefine \refname or \bibname to get that to display correctly in Swedish.

share|improve this answer
1  
Using biblatex (which in itself was horrible initially) was easier than constructing custom natbib-styles :) –  Oscar Oct 18 '10 at 15:51
    
@Oscar: I was thinking it'd be a simple matter of modifying an existing one, not creating a new one. But glad it worked out with BibLaTeX. (I've never used it myself.) –  TH. Oct 18 '10 at 16:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.