Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am a newbie in Latex and forgive me if the question seems dum. I have the following entry in my Bibliography.

@misc{fuller2011,
 author               = {V. Fuller and D. Farinacci and D. Meyer and D. Lewis},
 month                = {June},
 organization         = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
 publisher            = {IETF},
 series               = {Request for Comments},
 title                = {LISP Alternative Topology (LISP+ALT)},
 year                 = {2011},
 howpublished         = {http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-alt-07},
 }

When I use \bibliographystyle{plain}, I see the following in the subsequent .pdf:

    V. Fuller, D. Farinacci, D. Meyer, and D. Lewis. Lisp alternative topol-
ogy (lisp+alt). http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-alt-07, June
2011.

Which is OK.

But, when I use \bibliographystyle{acm}, (I am forced to use "acm") I see the following in the subsequent .pdf:

Fuller, V., Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., and Lewis, D. Lisp
alternative topology (lisp+alt), http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-alt-07, June 2011.

You see that commas are put within one name (i.e. names are not displayed correctly). What am I doing wrong? How can I fix this? I am using MikTEX 2.8 with TexNicCenter in Windows XP.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

Contrary to the plain bibliography style, the acm style uses a lastname/firstname scheme to display author names, and it is common for this scheme to put a comma between the different name parts. Have a look at the ACM LaTeX style guide -- commas between last name and first name are the way it's meant to be.

share|improve this answer
2  
while it's true that the acm style (and lots of others) use this over-comma'ed style, it gets to be very hard to read when there are more than two authors. and perish the thought that one of them should be a junior or similar! the latest edition of chicago specifies that only the first author should be listed last-name-first, with the others in normal order. earlier editions had all names last-name-first, but separated the names by semicolons to eliminate the confusion. someone should suggest to acm that there are more scrutable styles. –  barbara beeton Mar 16 '12 at 16:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.