TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm writing a conference paper that has to be formatted using certain .sty file. For all other work, I'm maintaining one bibliography.bib, I'd like to use here as well. Is it possible?

In the template, such an example of bibliography item inclusion is given:

  Smith, John,
  \emph{An example reference}.
  Publishing House, UK,
  2nd Edition,

The style definition says:

% Bibliography
      \small\renewcommand\newblock{\hskip .11em \@plus.33em \@minus.07em}%
       {\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%

%% setup 8/10 type
  \itemsep=2pt \parsep=0pt \parskip 8pt

\def\sameauthor{\leavevmode\vrule height 2pt depth -1.6pt width 23pt}

What I normally do in my documents is:

\bibliographystyle{plain} %Style of Bibliography: plain / apalike / amsalpha...
\bibliography{bibliography} %You need a file 'bibliography.bib' for this.

When I tried merging the above two:


I'm getting an error saying \bibliographystyle is missing (adding it causes the bibliography to look different than required by conference organizers). Isn't there a way to use bibliography.bib and make it look as defined in .sty?

share|improve this question
this conference expects you to type out all your references, rather than extract them from your database using bibtex: how many do you have? if it's fewer than 10 (or so), it will probably be best to go with their (uneducated) method -- just write out your biblio. if it's a large number of references, it may be possible to find a plausible replacement. cs.stir.ac.uk/~kjt/software/latex/showbst.html used to be a standard place to look, but they've mangled it and it's now only just readable; the other possibility is web.reed.edu/cis/help/LaTeX/bibtexstyles.html: looks neat. – wasteofspace Apr 3 '12 at 15:09
Thanks for the links. I also think extracting the references I need is probably the easiest solution, and therefore optimal, at least for now. I was just wondering, if there was a way to make my bibliography look as they expected without the copy-paste work (which would probably be optimal assuming I'll face similar questions in the future). I'm guessing, there is not? – mmm Apr 3 '12 at 17:49
@wasteofspace Please turn your comment into an answer, so that this question is removed from the "unanswered" list. – lockstep Jun 2 '12 at 21:32
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Thanks for the links wasteofspace. I also think extracting the references I need is probably the easiest solution, and therefore optimal, at least for now.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.