Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Admission of Confusion

Clearly I'm confused, I'll update the question as best as I can as people point out my lack of understanding.

Ultimate Goal

I like the fonts that pdfLaTeX uses to create documents. I especially like the symbols in ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-letter.pdf.

I don't know how these fonts are created. However, I would like to have them as ttf (or some other format easily usable in my own applications).

I have heard that metafont is related to this (supposedly it's a way to generate fonts). However, as pointed out, metafont is bitmap, whereas ttf is vector.

Question

How do I generate a ttf (or something similarly usable) for the various math symbols used in ams math?

More possible points of confusion

Given that pdfLaTeX can produce a pdf file that contains the ams math symbols. I assume (perhaps I'm way off here) that there has to be some way to produce ttf fonts of the ams math symbols.

Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
I'm confused: do you want to output .ttf files from pdfTeX? –  Joseph Wright May 17 '12 at 21:08
    
The metafont fonts are included as bitmaps. TTF fonts are, as you know, vector fonts. There is no way to change a bitmap into a vector font (you can use a tool to try to derive a vector font from a bitmap, but that's another question) –  topskip May 17 '12 at 21:10
    
1) most fonts used in that list are not metafont bitmap, they are type 1 fonts 2) type 1 fonts can be converted to CFF fonts, a Postscript flavor OTF font. 3) Converting from Type1 to TrueType is possible but they use different model to describe glyphs's shape, so that is not what people usually do 4) You can find all those fonts, find the pfb files etc, and convert than to CFF OTF fonts, but there is the encoding problem to consider. OTF use unicode, while latex fonts encoding is totally a different story. This is actually the most difficult part, (I guess) –  Yan Zhou May 17 '12 at 21:14
    
BTW, what makes you think "pdftex can produce PDF" leads to it can produce TTF fonts? Don't take it the wrong way. I am just curious. If you can provide some logic behind this maybe it does make sense and there is a way. –  Yan Zhou May 17 '12 at 21:15
    
@Yan Zhou: It was poorly written, and I'm not explaining my thoughts clearly. Are there other points I should clarify on? –  user13546 May 17 '12 at 21:18

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

It may take more than comments to clarify some things. So here is an answer though it probably won't get what you want. Don't hesitate to ask if there are unclear points.

  1. Metafonts are rarely used today. What you saw are some Type 1 variant of the AMS fonts.
  2. TeX, either pdfTeX or others, don't really generate fonts. Basically what TeX know about fonts are the glyph's metrics: e.g., how large is x or A, what's the width and height and depths they occupy. In the end. What TeX see is a lot of boxes.
  3. However, each box has a input encoding associated with it. So that TeX know things like "this box is an A". And when TeX generate the output DVI or PDF in the case pdfTeX, it maps these boxes to specific fonts' glyphs, through the output encoding. And pdfTeX will embde those Type1 fonts. And when a PDF reader open the file, it use the embedded fonts and position information of the PDF file to draw all those glyphs.
  4. So from start to end, TeX does not really generate any fonts. Sometime, when Metafont is really used, today's TeX can automatically call external program, mf etc to generate the bitmap fonts, but still TeX it still only see the glyphs are boxes.

The above explanations are not exactly how TeX works. But it shall explain how TeX saw fonts. Things like encodings has changed from engine to engine. For example LuaTeX use a font table to store the metrics information and use Unicode for both input and output.

So the conclusion is that, pdfTeX has (almost) nothing to do with generating fonts.

Therefore, I think you question can be rephrased as the following

How do I transfer the fonts used in a file to TTF fonts

  1. Find the fonts. Most likely you will find many Type 1 PostScript fonts. You will not find those fonts in the PDF file generated by pdfTeX. (Not exactly, there are tools to extract embedded fonts). You need to read the source file, see what fonts are used, and find the corresponding PostScript fonts.
  2. Use a font editing tool to convert those pfb files, along with their metrics (afm files), to a modern OpenType files. Free tools including FontForge and Adobe Font Development Kit. The later was designed exactly for this purpose: transfer old Type 1 fonts to new OpenType fonts.

Also, why do you want TTF instead of OTF? OTF can be used by most platforms. TTF use quadratic Bézier splines while OpenType can use the same cubic Bézier splines as Type1 fonts (the so called CFF fonts, a PostScript flavor of OTF). I haven't done any actual converting myself, but I think it shall be more natural to convert Type1 to CFF rathe than TTF. I guess you use Windows, and TTF is indeed more common there. But recent Windows support OTF as well (without ClearType obviously, which use TTF hinting explicitly)

The last, I hope I got your idea right. Do you think that because pdfTeX can generate PDF files that can be viewed by modern applications like Adobe Reader, so it must have a way to generate modern format fonts which is commonly used in today's applications? In fact, that is just a feature of the PDF file format, which allows font embedding. And not only TTF, OpenType, Type1, Type3 even bitmap fonts all can be embedded in a PDF file and be viewed by a PDF reader. To do that pdfTeX need to know 1) the font metrics 2) where to find the font files to embed.

If all you want, ultimately, is being able to input those math symbols in other applications, say Word, then you can simply use a OpenType math fonts. Freely available fonts are XITS-Math, Asana-Math, Commercial fonts including LucidaBr Math (cost 90USD) and Minion Math (something like 700EUR for a complete set, but I found it worth it). Also Cambria Math is distributed with Windows and Office (for both Windows and Mac). The last, the computer modern fonts can be replaced with Latin Modern, and Computer Modern math symbols can be found in Latin Modern Math.

share|improve this answer
    
You, sir, are a genius for being able to produce an precise and helpful response to an unclear and confusing question. –  user13546 May 17 '12 at 23:33

TeX today still doesn't rely much on True Type (.ttf) or Open Type (.otf) fonts natively, and mostly uses Type 1 fonts (.afm and .pfb).

That being said, have a look at the folder <tex installation dir and possibly texmf-... subdir>/fonts. You should have a truetype and an opentype folder, each containing the corresponding font files (such as marvosym.ttf, which contains many of the symbols of The Comprehensive LaTeX Symbol List). And if you're brave, you can have a shot at converting the other formats as suggested in another answer.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.