Take the 2-minute tour ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I can't imagine this isn't covered elsewhere, but for the life of my I can't find it. (Forgive me, I'm very new to LaTeX.)

I'm running pandoc to generate PDFs based on a markdown document, but right now my bibliography is being formatted just like another other paragraph: leading indent, no space between entries. I'd like to format it with hanging indents and a slight space between sections. It seems like that should be default behavior, but even when I strip away the LaTeX template to bare bones, I can't get the bibliography to behave properly.

I'm running the memoir class, and using the chicago-fullnotes-bibliography style. I'm wondering if there's either a way to change default bibliography behavior, or hack a different indent pattern for that section of the document.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

I'm not sure what 'chicago-fullnotes-bibliography' is, but if it is based on biblatex, the following lengths are probably what you want to redefine to your liking:

\setlength{\bibhang}{11pt}% the hanging indent
\setlength{\bibitemsep}{6pt}% the separation b/w basic items
\setlength{\bibinitsep}{\baselineskip}% insert blank line between different initial letters

These will work with the memoir class; change the lengths to suit your needs.

If you are not using biblatex, but need to follow the Chicago style, I recommend you switch sooner rather than later to biblatex and biber, and use the biblatex-chicago contributed style. It implements CMS 16th ed., and is under active development. The author is also responsive to feedback about potential problems.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm accepting the answer because that definitely should fix it, but unfortunately I'm realizing that pandoc doesn't actually let the LaTeX template do much with the bibliography. chicago-fullnotes-bibliography is a CSL style, and pandoc does all the bibliography formatting as per its specifications. (Unfortuately, it doesn't seem to be responding to those, either--but that's a question for the pandoc listserve.) Thanks for your help! –  Brian Hamilton May 29 '12 at 10:14
    
Indeed. There is nothing in the .csl that gives formatting directives about the bibliography. I guess that makes sense, but the Chicago style can be pretty picky about things. As for pandoc, my limited experience suggested that it couldn't (then; yet?) handle all of biblatex's capabilities. (But I'm an emacs user, so org-mode would be my starting point for simple documents; and of course real LaTeX when I want to write something complicated....) –  jon May 29 '12 at 17:33
    
Brain, I think pandoc leaves most of the bibliography work to LaTeX (instead of doing it itself) if you supply the --biblatex switch. –  loevborg Aug 21 '12 at 21:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.