TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have created bibliography project with books about dancing history: https://github.com/georgthegreat/dancebooks-bibtex

It is a good practice (for manuscript entries) to add library, where this manuscript is being stored.

I failed to find field for this purpose. So, how do I add the library to the bibliography?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I'd rather use biblatex. It's a much more recent system (the venerable bibtex is over two decades old...) If you want to stick to bibtex, you can either use an predefined field like note or you can create your own library field, which will be ignored, that is, it will not be listed. A relevant passage from the bibtex documentation - page 8 off CTAN:

ignored - The field is ignored. BibTEX ignores any field that is not required or optional, so you can include any fields you want in a bib file entry. It's a good idea to put all relevant information about a reference in its bib file entry - even information that may never appear in the bibliography. For example, if you want to keep an abstract of a paper in a computer file, put it in an abstract field in the paper's bib file entry. The bib file is likely to be as good a place as any for the abstract, and it is possible to design a bibliography style for printing selected abstracts. Note: Misspelling a field name will result in its being ignored, so watch out for typos (especially for optional fields, since BibTEX won't warn you when those are missing).

So, as you see, you can include it anyway. The trickier part is if you need to list it.

On the other hand, biblatex does have a library field defined, see the manual - page 19:

library - field (literal)

This field may be useful to record information such as a library name and a call number. This may be printed by a special bibliography style if desired. Not used by the standard bibliography styles.

share|improve this answer
Hmm. I'l think about biblatex. Can you give some advices about migrating from bibtex (I use bibtex8 to compile database) to biblatex? – Georg May 29 '12 at 11:11
@Georg: I think it's best if you start by reading the documentation off CTAN. It's pretty well written. – Count Zero May 29 '12 at 14:36
Wow! Biblatex is cool thing! No more polish notation! – Georg May 31 '12 at 10:36

I just wanted to ask a similar question and before asking it search for something similar and found yours.

Up until now I've been using biblatex's techreport to manage manuscripts in my bibliography-file. It looks like this:

Author = {{Sayf al-Dīn} al-Āmidī},
Title = {Kitāb Kašf al-tamwīhāt fī Šarḥ al-Tanbīhāt},
Type = {Ms.},
Number = {Laleli 2519},     % that is the Signature
Address = {Istanbul},
Institution = {Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi}}

the output is:

Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī. Kitāb Kašf al-tamwīhāt fī Šarḥ al-Tanbīhāt. Ms. Laleli 2519. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi.

I think the output is just like a reference to a manuscript should look like.

Still, I would like to urge the developers of biblatex to include a "manuscript" type in future versions, for - of course - a manuscript is not a tech report.

share|improve this answer
With biblatex 2.0+biber 1.0 which will be released very soon, the datamodel is dynamic so you can add any field/entrytype you like. Of course you then have to modify your style to use this field but that's easy with biblatex. – PLK Jul 1 '12 at 14:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.