TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When I pdflatex text containing "fi", e.g. "infinite", the resulting pdf-file looks correct, e.g. "infinite" is shown in the text. But when I search the pdf file for "infinite", 0 occurrences are found. When I copy "infinite" and paste it, the result is "innite". Searching for "innite" results in 0 occurrences as well.

What causes this behavior? My font not being able to handle ligatures? How can I fix it, such that "fi" is treated the same as any other letter combination?

share|improve this question
What font are you using in which encoding? Try \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\usepackage{lmodern}. – Martin Scharrer May 30 '12 at 11:41
I'm using komascript and the default font (I don't load any package other than komascript that messes with font settings). – DaveBall aka user750378 May 30 '12 at 11:43
@Martin: thanks, the result looks identical (ie. I don't see any change in the font), but the "fi"-problem is gone. Could you write your comment as answer? Then you could maybe say what the lmodern package is, and why \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} is not sufficient. And I can accept your answer, to help later readers of this question. – DaveBall aka user750378 May 30 '12 at 11:47
up vote 11 down vote accepted

LaTex use ligatures in the text and the PDF-readers treat that as one, unknown character. As far as I remember, I solved the same problem by adding the following two lines in the preamble:


I found this solution in the MinionPro manual, page 7.

I use utf8 encoding in my document, i.e.


Also have a look at Ulrike Fischer’s answer to a similar question regarding Linux Libertine.

glyphtounicode was included in the MiKTeX-distribution I use, but if it is not included in yours, you can find it at Sarovar.

share|improve this answer
using only \input{glyphtounicode}\pdfgentounicode=1 without \usepackage[utf8]{inputenx}\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} is sufficient to solve the problem. What's the advantage of using glyphtounicode compared to fontenc (and lmodern as mentioned by Martin)? – DaveBall aka user750378 May 30 '12 at 11:54
I don't know if there is any advantage. My TeX-skills are limited, I am on the level: ‘Find other’s solution to a problem and copy it’. – Sveinung May 30 '12 at 12:05
@Sveinung, perhaps you should add the link to the glyphtounicode file here as well? – henrique May 30 '12 at 13:15

This problem can AFAIK be solved by using the Latin modern font in T1 encoding:


I guess it helps the PDF (viewer) to indicate which real letters are represented by the ligatures.

share|improve this answer
What's the advantage of using fontenc and lmodern compared to glyphtounicode, as mentioned by Sveinung? – DaveBall aka user750378 May 30 '12 at 11:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.