Sign up ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
Different command definitions with and without optional argument

I would like to define a macro which takes an optional argument, and behaves in different ways depending on if the optional argument is given or not. As a very simple example, I would like to define a new macro

\newcommand{\example}[0][]{macro definition}

which outputs

optional argument was omitted

if the optional argument was omitted, and

optional argument was given

if the optional argument was given. How can I achieve this?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Loop Space, David Carlisle, egreg, lockstep, yo' Jun 5 '12 at 11:11

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Note that [0] here would create a command with no arguments at all: you need [1][] to have one optional argument. –  Joseph Wright Jun 5 '12 at 11:06

1 Answer 1

up vote 19 down vote accepted



The optional argument was \test[].

The optional argument was \test[shubidu].


Which results in

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
Slightly better: \ifthenelse{\isempty{#1}} (the \isempty test is provided by xifthen. –  egreg Jun 5 '12 at 11:11
Oh, I didn't know it existed. You live and learn! –  Tom Bombadil Jun 5 '12 at 11:14
Also, it seems \ifx can be used: \newcommand{\test}[1][]{ \def\tst{#1} \ifx\tst\empty \typeout{optional argument was omitted} \else \typeout{optional argument was given: '#1'} \fi } –  sdaau Jun 3 at 17:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.