Tell me more ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 0 down vote favorite
1

For a variety of reasons, it looks like I need to use \psfragfig in place of \includegraphics. Provided I load all the necessary packages, is there any drawback to doing this? I understand from the psfrag manual that \psfragfig is based on \includegraphics. Does it retain all of its features; does \psfragfig add any limitations in what it can do or where it can be used? Or can I simply use it everywhere I would otherwise use \includegraphics?

share|improve this question
\psfragfig is specific of pstools for using psfrag in pdflatex. The question doesn't make much sense. – egreg Jun 10 '12 at 23:14
@egreg: The question is a follow up to your comment on another question of mine suggesting that \psfragfig was required for the scenario there. In any case, the question is not about the reasons for using it, but about the relationship between the two commands. – raxacoricofallapatorius Jun 10 '12 at 23:32

closed as not a real question by lockstep, Marco Daniel, Joseph Wright♦ Sep 1 '12 at 21:13

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.