Tell me more ×
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I don't know how to cite a chapter written by an author that is not the editor or author of the book. How can I get the following citation?

Grandstrand, O. (2004), 'Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights', in J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

share|improve this question

4 Answers

Perhaps not exactly how you want it to appear (that requires probably selecting the right bibtex style) but here is something close with the standard:

\begin{filecontents}{test.bib}
@inbook{ X,
author = {O. Grandstrand},
chapter = {Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights},
crossref = {Y}
}

@book{ Y,
editor = {J. Fagerberg and D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson}, 
title      = {Oxford Handbook of Innovation},
booktitle = {Oxford Handbook of Innovation},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
year = 2004
}
\end{filecontents}

\documentclass{article}

\begin{document}

\nocite{*}

\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{test}

\end{document}

This results in

enter image description here

There are two reference here (both the chapter and the book) because I use \notcite on all antries. If just the chapter is cited then the result would be

enter image description here

The problem is that most if not all styles (that I know of) do not use both author and editor in a single entry even though it would make a lot of sense here. They only do that for @inproceedings and @incollection (I see that you found the latter by now yourself).

By default, BibTeX adds a separate citation to the whole book cross referenced when there are 2 or more different citations that crossref a complete work (even if the complete work is not explicitly cited anywhere. On modern BibTeX implementations this can be customized when running BibTeX by using the switch --min-crossref=<number>.

share|improve this answer
This is not what I am looking for as I want just to cite the chapter, and not the book.... I use Chicago or Harvard style, I forgot to mention... – mmc Jun 22 '12 at 16:51
This is due to me citing all entries (see updated answer). However the form "In XYZ" is only used by BibTeX (min most styles) for @incollection or @inproceedings. – Frank Mittelbach Jun 23 '12 at 6:58

I believe that the entry type you want to use is called @incollection. E.g., the entry could be:

@incollection{X,
  author      = "O. Grandstrand",
  title       = "Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights",
  editor      = "J. Fagerberg and D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson",
  booktitle   = "Oxford Handbook of Innovation",
  publisher   = "Oxford University Press",
  address     = "Oxford",
  year        = 2004,
}

Using the plain bibliography style would generate the following entry in a bibliography:

enter image description here

Addendum: If you use the chicago bibliography style (along with the natbib package, say), you'll get:

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
This is perfect... But if you use another style, like Chicago Style, you can not see the author of the book. – mmc Jun 22 '12 at 17:34
@mmc -- I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by your claim. I've provided an addendum to my answer, to show the result if one uses the "chicago" instead of the "plain" bibliography style; both the author of the book chapter and the editors of the book itself are shown without a problem. – Mico Jun 22 '12 at 18:09

Thank you all... finally, using @incollection, it worked.

@INCOLLECTION{X,
  author={Grandstrand, O.},
  year= 2004, 
  title={Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights}, 
  editor = {J. Fagerberg and D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson}, 
  booktitle= {Oxford Handbook of Innovation}, 
  publisher= {Oxford University Press},
  address= {Oxford}, 
}
share|improve this answer
It worked also using the Chicago Style. The problem was that the BibTex tells you that you can not put both editor and author but then, it does not matter at all... – mmc Jun 22 '12 at 18:05
I'm glad that the @incollection entry type works for you. Please be sure to also "accept" (by clicking on the check mark symbol) the answer that you found most helpful. – Mico Jun 23 '12 at 10:35

use

@inbook{test,
  author={Grandstrand, O.},
  year= 2004, 
  chapter={Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights}, 
  editor = {J. Fagerberg and D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson}, 
  title= {Oxford Handbook of Innovation}, 
  publisher= {Oxford University Press},
  address= {Oxford}, 
}

with biblatex and style authoryear I'll get:

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
1  
that somehow comes out wrong, the chapter title is in the "in ..." part where it doesn't belong. Problem with biblatex? – Frank Mittelbach Jun 22 '12 at 15:30
here, the title of the chapter is missing... – mmc Jun 22 '12 at 17:23
@mmc no not missing, but in a strange place at the end of the entry. I think the resulting entry is wrong for this reason – Frank Mittelbach Jun 23 '12 at 7:25
@FrankMittelbach This is not a problem with biblatex - rather with the style authoryear. The style chicago-authordate looks about right, especially if one changes title into booktitle – cgnieder Jan 25 at 19:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.