TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Using the Termes font in a large dictionary project, the open parenthesis and lower case Roman j glyphs are often in contact, and my proofreader has asked me to fix the problem, which she calls a "crash". I've tried inserting a small space manually in these places, but I wonder if there's another solution. Italics are not involved, so I see that italic correction will not work, but perhaps there is something similar for inappropriate touching between ( and j?

The text is raggedright; I'd prefer not to make any substantial changes to the rest of the code.


to inlay (\tiny{~}\normalsize jewels
to inlay (jewels

enter image description here

share|improve this question
This should probably be reported to the developers of the TeX Gyre fonts. \kern.1em would probably be better than \tiny{~}\normalfont, however. – egreg Jun 26 '12 at 15:36
\tiny does not take an argument so (\tiny{~}\normalsize j would be better written as ({\tiny~}j but better still would be something like (\kern0.1em j so it automatically adjusted to the current font size. The more automatic (but more involved) version would be to modify or make a vf file that adjusted the font metrics to add a kern. (I think xetex or luatex could do this without making a vf file) – David Carlisle Jun 26 '12 at 15:39
@egreg: Sorry, but how do I report an issue to the font developers? – brannerchinese Jun 26 '12 at 16:09
The documentation says to contact Bogusław Jackowski: B_Jackowski AT gust DOT org DOT pl – egreg Jun 26 '12 at 16:30
@egreg: Done; thanks. – brannerchinese Jun 26 '12 at 18:31
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The solution, provided by @egreg and @David Carlisle in comments, is to use

(\kern0.1em j

Works like a dream; actually exactly like a dream. Here's a comparison of the outputs; the manual kerning is second.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.