# Change the vertical spacing above unnumbered sections headings

How can I change the vertical spacing above the section heading that dont have a number (like for instance the table of contents, the list of figures and the bibliograpy) while keeping the spacing of all other chapters the same? (I am using the report class.)

-

This answer was taken mostly verbatim from How to remove top margin above \tableofcontents.

In the standard document classes (like book and report), \tableofcontents (and friends) is set as a \chapter*:

\newcommand\tableofcontents{%
\if@twocolumn
\@restonecoltrue\onecolumn
\else
\@restonecolfalse
\fi
\chapter*{\contentsname
\@mkboth{%
\MakeUppercase\contentsname}{\MakeUppercase\contentsname}}%
\@starttoc{toc}%
\if@restonecol\twocolumn\fi
}


So, it would be possible to temporarily modify the chapter heading macro to not insert as much vertical space. Here's a look at the \chapter* heading macro \@makeschapterhead:

\def\@makeschapterhead#1{%
\vspace*{50\p@}%
{\parindent \z@ \raggedright
\normalfont
\interlinepenalty\@M
\Huge \bfseries  #1\par\nobreak
\vskip 40\p@
}}


Note the insertion of vertical space (\vspace*{50\p@}) before setting the heading. So, we can temporarily redefine this macro to not insert the vertical space (or modify it to whatever you need):

\documentclass{report}

\begin{document}

\begingroup
\makeatletter
% Redefine the \chapter* header macro to remove vertical space
%\vspace*{50\p@}% Remove the vertical space
{\parindent \z@ \raggedright
\normalfont
\interlinepenalty\@M
\Huge \bfseries  #1\par\nobreak
\vskip 40\p@
}}
\makeatother

\tableofcontents
\endgroup
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\end{document}


The grouping of the redefinition makes it local. Therefore, all modifications are restored after \endgroup. The same idea goes for \listoffigures, \listoftables, etc. Of course, a global change to \@makeschapterhead would also suffice as the ToC, LoF and LoT are typically all unnumbered chapters.

Here is another suggestion that patches \@makeschapterhead using etoolbox:

\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{etoolbox}

\makeatletter
% \patchcmd{<cmd>}{<search>}{<replace>}{<success>}{<failure>}
\makeatother

\begin{document}

\tableofcontents

\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}

\end{document}


Since the \chapter* header macro only uses \vspace*{..} to insert the gap between the text block and chapter header, you could also redefine \vspace to gobble the two arguments (* and {50\p@}):

\documentclass{book}
\begin{document}
\begingroup
\renewcommand{\vspace}[2]{}% Gobble 2 arguments after \vspace
\tableofcontents
\endgroup
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\chapter{A chapter}\section{A section}\subsection{A subsection}
\end{document}


While the above suggestion may seem simple, it may have negative effects elsewhere in your document where you use \vspace (perhaps indirectly) if the change is made global (rather than the suggested localization through grouping). It is therefore not advised in the global use case.

Other packages (including titlesec) can also be used to obtain this result.

-
Thank you very much for your extensive explanation! – Jan Jul 4 '12 at 8:50
@Jan: If this answered your original question, consider up-voting and accepting it as such. See How do you accept an answer? – Werner Jul 4 '12 at 10:23